Summary
A 40-year-old computer system analyst was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline J (Criminal Conduct) and Guideline E (Personal Conduct). The Statement of Reasons detailed numerous criminal incidents spanning from 1997 to 2017. These included charges for underage alcohol possession in 1999 and 2001, and trespassing in 2001.
More serious incidents involved a 1997 charge for 2nd and 3rd degree assault, and a 1999 felony criminal mischief and harassment charge from a park brawl. In 1999, he was also charged with 3rd degree criminal mischief for breaking car windows. Military police issued nonjudicial punishment for disorderly conduct in 2006, and in 2004, he faced battery and disorderly conduct charges from a bar fight, with the battery charge dismissed. Later, in 2014, he was arrested for assault by contact, with charges dismissed after probation. Recent incidents included a 2016 DUI charge and a 2017 domestic dispute where he pushed his wife and impeded her 911 call.
While some mitigating conditions were considered, the judge found insufficient evidence of rehabilitation and a lack of candor regarding his past behavior. The decision highlighted ongoing concerns about the applicant's judgment and reliability, ultimately leading to the denial of his security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant admitted to multiple instances of criminal conduct, including DUI and domestic violence.
- The applicant did not demonstrate sufficient rehabilitation or candor regarding his past behavior.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 31(a)raisedPattern of Minor Offenses
- AG ¶ 31(b)raisedEvidence of Criminal Conduct
- AG ¶ 16(e)appliedPersonal Conduct Creating Vulnerability
- AG ¶ 32(a)appliedTime Elapsed Since Criminal Behavior
- AG ¶ 32(d)rejectedEvidence of Successful RehabilitationInsufficient time has passed to conclude that his criminal behavior will not recur.
- AG ¶ 17(c)appliedMinor Offense or Unique Circumstances
- AG ¶ 17(d)rejectedAcknowledgment and CounselingThe applicant did not fully disclose his criminal record during evaluation.
- AG ¶ 17(e)rejectedSteps to Reduce VulnerabilityThe applicant did not demonstrate full candor regarding his behavior.
Key Rule Quoted
“"Once a concern arises regarding an applicant’s security clearance eligibility, there is a strong presumption against the grant or maintenance of a security clearance."”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedNov 15, 2019
- Answer filedFeb 4, 2020
- Hearing heldMar 16, 2021
- Decision dateApr 27, 2021
Cite For
- Insufficient Candor Regarding Past Criminal Behavior Under Guideline E
- Pattern of Criminal Conduct Affecting Judgment and Reliability Under Guideline J
- Presumption Against Granting Security Clearance When Concerns Arise