Skip to content

Stages of a DOHA case

After a Statement of Reasons, the process follows a published path: answer the allegations, choose a hearing or a written-record decision, receive a judge's decision, and, in some cases, appeal. This page describes that path as it appears across the decided public cases in this archive.

The stages of a contested case

  1. 1

    Receipt of the SOR

    The case becomes formal when a Statement of Reasons, the government's written list of its concerns (an SOR), is received. It lists each security concern by guideline and numbered allegation. An SOR is an allegation, not a decision, and nothing has been adjudicated at that point. In the decided record, a substantial share of such cases ended in a grant. What the SOR looks like.

  2. 2

    The written answer: a 20-day deadline

    For contractor cases the answer is generally due within 20 days of receipt (extensions are often requested; the deadline printed in your own paperwork controls). It admits or denies each allegation, with an explanation. If no answer is filed, the rules allow the case to be decided against the applicant without a hearing. The answer also states which path the applicant chooses: a live hearing, or a decision on the written record. Work out the calendar dates.

  3. 3A

    Route A: the hearing

    Most applicants who respond choose a hearing. It is held before an Administrative Judge, typically within 150 miles of the applicant, with at least 15 days' notice. It is a contested proceeding: the government's lawyer (called Department Counsel) takes part, and the applicant may testify, bring documents, and bring witnesses. The judge can hold the record open briefly for follow-up documents.

    3B

    Route B: the written record (FORM)

    No hearing: the government sends its file (the FORM), and the applicant has 30 days to respond in writing with evidence. A judge then decides on the papers. In the decided record, written-record cases are granted less often than hearing cases. Those counts are on the statistics page.

    An applicant takes 3A or 3B, never both.

  4. 4

    The decision

    The judge issues a written decision, typically within a couple of months after the hearing, with findings on every allegation and a final ruling: eligibility granted or denied. These are the published decisions this site archives, summarizes, and counts.

  5. 5

    Appeal: limited review, short deadlines

    Either side can appeal: a notice within 15 days, the appeal brief within 45, a reply within 20. The Appeal Board does not rehear the case and accepts no new evidence. It checks for specific errors and affirms, reverses, or remands. In the decided record, most appeals were affirmed: the Board overturned roughly 7% of the appeals brought to it (details in the appeals section).

What the record shows

  • Outcomes vary widely by the type of concern and its specifics: which concerns are hardest to overcome.
  • In decided hearings, applicants with a lawyer were granted at a meaningfully higher rate than those without: the numbers. (An association in the record, not a causal claim.)
  • Decisions involving comparable circumstances can be located by searching the record or by sending the letter received to CASE Prep for comparison.

Glossary

SOR (Statement of Reasons)
The government's formal letter listing exactly why it has concerns about clearance eligibility, allegation by allegation (1.a, 1.b, and so on).
Guideline (A to M)
The 13 categories of security concern. An SOR cites one or more.
  • A · Allegiance to the United States: acts against the country, such as sabotage, espionage, treason, or advocating its overthrow by force (rarely alleged).
  • B · Foreign Influence: close family or financial ties abroad that could create a risk of foreign pressure or divided loyalty.
  • C · Foreign Preference: acting to favor another country, such as using a foreign passport or serving in a foreign military.
  • D · Sexual Behavior: conduct that is criminal, shows poor judgment, or could make a person a target for blackmail.
  • E · Personal Conduct: dishonesty or lack of candor, especially leaving required facts off the security questionnaire (SF-86).
  • F · Financial Considerations: significant unpaid or delinquent debts, or unfiled or unpaid taxes.
  • G · Alcohol Consumption: alcohol-related incidents such as a DUI, or a diagnosis of alcohol use disorder.
  • H · Drug Involvement and Substance Misuse: illegal drug use, or misuse of prescription medication.
  • I · Psychological Conditions: a condition a qualified professional says may affect judgment or reliability (seeking counseling by itself is generally not a concern).
  • J · Criminal Conduct: a history of arrests, charges, or convictions.
  • K · Handling Protected Information: failing to properly store, protect, or handle classified or sensitive information.
  • L · Outside Activities: outside work or ties, such as for a foreign entity, that could conflict with clearance duties.
  • M · Use of Information Technology: unauthorized use of, or changes to, IT systems, hardware, or software.
Answer
The applicant's written response to the SOR: admit or deny each allegation, with an explanation. Also where the applicant chooses a hearing or a written-record decision.
FORM (File of Relevant Material)
The written-record route: no hearing. The government sends its file, the applicant responds in writing, and a judge decides on the papers.
Administrative Judge (AJ)
The DOHA judge who holds the hearing (or reads the FORM) and issues the decision.
Department Counsel
Counsel for the government in a DOHA case.
Mitigation and mitigating conditions
The officially recognized ways a concern can be overcome (debts resolved, time passed, circumstances beyond the person's control), listed in the guidelines themselves.
Whole-person concept
The rule that the judge must weigh everything about the applicant, not just the allegations, in reaching a decision.
Decision (granted / denied)
The judge's published ruling: eligibility granted or continued, or denied or revoked, with findings on each allegation.
Appeal Board
A three-member DOHA panel that reviews decisions for specific errors. It does not rehear the case and accepts no new evidence. It affirms, reverses, or remands.
Remand
The Appeal Board sending a case back to the judge to correct an identified error.

Which letter did you receive?

How the process worksA contested case follows a published sequence. Open this for the short version, or put a question to Ask Mode on the home page. Accounts are free and include up to 25 questions per day.

A contested case follows a published path: a Statement of Reasons, the government's written list of its concerns (an SOR), a written answer, a hearing or a decision on the written record, the judge's decision, and in some cases an appeal.

Read the stages of a DOHA case · Ask a question about the process

Process facts compiled from official directives and established practitioner references; the letter received and the current rules control. Disclaimers.

Where to go from here

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

I am researching or teaching

Statistics, exports, monitoring, and the API, arranged individually. For scholarship and public interest work that usually means no charge.

Request access →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.