Summary
A 59-year-old software engineer was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct), Guideline H (Drug Involvement), and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The denial stemmed from a significant history of drug involvement, including marijuana use from approximately 1974 until September 2016, with at least three instances occurring in 2016 while holding a security clearance. The applicant was diagnosed with marijuana use in February 2017 and received an unsatisfactory evaluation in 2016 for violating company policy regarding marijuana use, leading to placement on a performance action plan.
The applicant's criminal record included multiple arrests and charges. These included charges for possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia in September 2016 and November 1997, and felony possession and distribution of marijuana in October 1985, for which he served nine months in jail. Other charges included engaging in construction without a license in July 1999 and February 1998 (the latter also involving felony forgery), violation of a protective order in March 1996, and various other offenses dating back to 1979, such as burglary, battery, and threatening a witness.
Despite some efforts toward rehabilitation, the judge found insufficient evidence of sustained rehabilitation and ongoing concerns regarding the applicant's reliability and trustworthiness. The lengthy history of drug involvement, recent use while cleared, and extensive criminal record contributed to the decision to deny the security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant had a lengthy history of drug involvement, including recent use while holding a security clearance.
- Insufficient evidence of rehabilitation was presented, raising concerns about the applicant's reliability and trustworthiness.
- The applicant's criminal history included multiple arrests and convictions, which contributed to doubts about his judgment.
Conditions Referenced
- DC ¶ 25(a)raisedAny Substance Misuse
- DC ¶ 25(c)raisedIllegal Possession of a Controlled Substance
- DC ¶ 25(f)raisedAny Illegal Drug Use While Granted Access to Classified Information
- DC ¶ 31(a)raisedA Pattern of Minor Offenses
- DC ¶ 31(b)raisedEvidence of Criminal Conduct
- MC ¶ 26(d)appliedSatisfactory Completion of a Prescribed Drug Treatment ProgramThe applicant received a favorable prognosis from his substance abuse evaluator.
- MC ¶ 32(a)rejectedSo Much Time Has Elapsed Since the Criminal Behavior HappenedThe applicant's recent drug use in 2016 prevents full application of this condition.
- MC ¶ 31(d)rejectedEvidence of Successful RehabilitationInsufficient evidence of sustainable mitigation was presented.
Key Rule Quoted
“[S]ecurity-clearance determinations should err, if they must, on the side of denials.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedNov 6, 2017
- Answer filedDec 27, 2017
- Hearing heldJun 5, 2018
- Decision dateDec 17, 2018
Cite For
- Insufficient Evidence of Rehabilitation Under Guideline H
- Pattern of Drug Involvement Impacting Security Clearance Eligibility
- Consideration of Past Criminal Conduct in Security Clearance Decisions