CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 24-00040 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 24-00040

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date4/4/2024
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Related decisionSee the hearing decision (Case 24-00040) →
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Edward W. Loughran
Government Counsel: Alison P. O'Connell
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 46-year-old former employee of a defense contractor who sought a security clearance after her interim clearance was withdrawn. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guideline F (financial considerations), specifically alleging that the applicant owed significant federal income taxes for the years 2020, 2021, and 2022, totaling over $38,000. The applicant admitted to these debts but attributed the financial issues to her husband's management of their finances and taxes.
Key facts revealed that the applicant and her husband had experienced financial difficulties, particularly during a downturn in her husband's construction business. They had previously sold their home for a substantial profit, using some proceeds to pay off credit card debts, but did not apply any of the funds to their tax obligations. The applicant claimed to have a payment plan in place with the IRS, but evidence indicated that the plan was in default, and the IRS had issued a notice of termination for the agreement. The applicant provided some documentation of payments made towards her student loans and state taxes, but the administrative judge found that the applicant did not sufficiently mitigate the financial concerns.
The administrative judge ruled against the applicant, concluding that the financial issues raised significant questions about her reliability and trustworthiness. The judge emphasized that the applicant's failure to meet her tax obligations, despite having the means to do so, indicated a lack of judgment and self-control, which are critical factors in determining eligibility for access to classified information. Consequently, the applicant's request for security clearance was denied.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 24-00040

deniedApr 4, 2024· Hon. Edward W. Loughran· hearing

Summary

A 46-year-old former defense contractor employee was denied a security clearance under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) due to unresolved federal income tax debts. The applicant owed a total of $38,346 for tax years 2020, 2021, and 2022. Specifically, the outstanding amounts were $9,158 for 2020, $8,854 for 2021, and $20,334 for 2022.

The denial was based on the applicant's failure to pay these federal income taxes and her inability to demonstrate a good-faith effort to resolve the debts or comply with an IRS installment agreement. The administrative judge cited Disqualifying Conditions AG ¶ 19(c) and AG ¶ 19(f).

The recent and ongoing nature of these financial issues raised concerns about the applicant's reliability and trustworthiness, ultimately leading to the denial of the security clearance.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant failed to pay federal income taxes for tax years 2020, 2021, and 2022, totaling $38,346.
The applicant did not demonstrate a good-faith effort to resolve her tax debts or maintain compliance with the IRS installment agreement.
The applicant's financial issues were recent and ongoing, casting doubt on her reliability and trustworthiness.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
AG ¶ 19(f)raisedFailure to File or Fraudulently Filing Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax Returns or Failure to Pay Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax as Required

Key Rule Quoted

“Any doubt concerning personnel being considered for national security eligibility will be resolved in favor of the national security.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedFeb 8, 2024
Answer filedFeb 16, 2024Requested decision based on written record.
Hearing held—No hearing; decision based on written record.
Decision dateApr 4, 2024

Cite For

Denial of Security Clearance Due to Unresolved Financial Obligations Under Guideline F
Insufficient Evidence of Financial Responsibility Impacting Security Clearance Eligibility
Importance of Compliance with Tax Obligations in Security Clearance Determinations

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant has outstanding federal income tax debts totaling $38,346 for the tax years 2020, 2021, and 2022. The judge ruled against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline F, concluding that the applicant did not mitigate the financial considerations security concerns.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant owes federal income taxes of $9,158 for tax year 2020 $9,158	Against Applicant	Tax Unpaid	Admitted	—	—	—
1.b	Applicant owes federal income taxes of $8,854 for tax year 2021 $8,854	Against Applicant	Tax Unpaid	Admitted	—	—	—
1.c	Applicant owes federal income taxes of $20,334 for tax year 2022 $20,334	Against Applicant	Tax Unpaid	Admitted	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.