Summary
A 27-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen, originally from Afghanistan, was denied a security clearance due to foreign influence concerns under Guideline B. The applicant, who served as a linguist for U.S. forces, had extensive family ties in Afghanistan. His wife, mother, father, stepmother, four brothers, six sisters, a stepbrother, and two stepsisters are all citizens and residents of Afghanistan. Additionally, his mother-in-law and father-in-law also reside there.
Further concerns arose from the applicant having sent approximately $100,000 to his family in Afghanistan since 2009. His stepbrother is employed by the Afghan Ministry of Public Health, and a cousin serves as a colonel in the Afghan Army. These connections raised disqualifying conditions related to foreign influence.
Despite the applicant's efforts to support his family, the judge found insufficient information to mitigate the security concerns. The presence of family members employed by the Afghan government and military, coupled with the ongoing instability and threats in Afghanistan, created a potential conflict of interest and increased the risk of foreign exploitation or coercion, leading to the denial of his security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant did not provide sufficient information to mitigate foreign influence security concerns due to his extensive family ties in Afghanistan.
- The applicant's family members include individuals employed by the Afghan government and military, creating a potential conflict of interest.
- The ongoing instability and threats in Afghanistan increase the risk of foreign exploitation or coercion.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with Foreign Family MembersThe applicant has numerous family members in Afghanistan, creating a heightened risk of foreign exploitation.
- AG ¶ 7(b)raisedConnections to Foreign PersonsThe applicant's connections to family members in Afghanistan create a potential conflict of interest.
- AG ¶ 8(a)rejectedNature of Relationships with Foreign PersonsThe applicant maintains strong ties and frequent contact with family members in Afghanistan.
- AG ¶ 8(b)rejectedNo Conflict of InterestThe applicant's financial support and close relationships with family members indicate a significant conflict of interest.
- AG ¶ 8(c)rejectedCasual and Infrequent ContactThe applicant has regular and frequent contact with his family members in Afghanistan.
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJun 23, 2016
- Answer filedAug 3, 2016Applicant elected to have the case decided on the written record.
- Hearing held—No hearing; decision based on written record.
- Decision dateNov 30, 2017
Cite For
- Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B Due to Family Ties in a Foreign Country
- Insufficient Mitigation of Security Concerns Related to Foreign Contacts
- Impact of Ongoing Instability in a Foreign Country on Security Clearance Eligibility