Summary
The applicant, a 35-year-old management analyst with dual U.S.-Lebanese citizenship, faced trustworthiness concerns under Guidelines B (foreign influence), C (foreign preference), and E (personal conduct). The applicant mitigated concerns regarding foreign influence and preference by demonstrating a lack of ongoing contact with foreign nationals and renouncing her Lebanese citizenship. The personal conduct allegations were refuted as oversights in disclosure.
Under Guideline B (Foreign Influence), Guideline C (Foreign Preference), and Guideline E (Personal Conduct), the Statement of Reasons alleged the following: Applicant’s father, sister, stepmother, and aunt are dual citizens of Lebanon and the United States, and they all live in the United States (1.a). Applicant’s mother-in-law and father-in-law are citizens and residents of Lebanon (1.b). Applicant maintains close and continuing contact with F and Z, and they are citizens of Lebanon and residents of UAE (1.c). Applicant maintains close and continuing contacts with B, a citizen and resident of Lebanon (1.d). Applicant has not communicated with F, Z, or B since 2016 (1.e). Applicant has never owned any property in Lebanon (1.f). Applicant has not communicated with her in-laws (1.g). Applicant has not communicated with F, Z, or B since 2016 (1.h). Applicant has not communicated with F, Z, or B since 2016 (1.i). Applicant has never held a Lebanese passport. On January 24, 2018, she gave her Lebanese Identification Card, which was issued to her in October 2009, to her security manager. She renounced her Lebanese citizenship (2.a). Applicant failed to disclose on her January 15, 2016 SCA that she and/or her spouse had bank accounts in Lebanon and the UAE (3.a). She also failed to disclose that she traveled to Lebanon in 2012 (3.b).
The judge granted the clearance. The government raised disqualifying conditions AG ¶ 7(a), AG ¶ 7(b). The judge applied mitigating conditions AG ¶ 8(a), AG ¶ 8(b). The decision turned on the following: Applicant demonstrated no ongoing contact with foreign nationals from Lebanon; Applicant renounced her Lebanese citizenship and has never held a Lebanese passport; Personal conduct allegations were determined to be oversights rather than intentional omissions.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- Applicant demonstrated no ongoing contact with foreign nationals from Lebanon.
- Applicant renounced her Lebanese citizenship and has never held a Lebanese passport.
- Personal conduct allegations were determined to be oversights rather than intentional omissions.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with Foreign Family Members
- AG ¶ 7(b)raisedConnections to a Foreign Country Creating Potential Conflict of Interest
- AG ¶ 8(a)appliedNature of Relationships with Foreign Persons Unlikely to Create Conflict
- AG ¶ 8(b)appliedNo Conflict of Interest Due to Loyalty or Obligation to Foreign Persons
Key Rule Quoted
“The Government must establish, by substantial evidence, conditions in the personal or professional history of the applicant which may disqualify the applicant from being eligible for access to sensitive information.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedMay 3, 2017
- Answer filedJun 3, 2017
- Hearing heldJan 29, 2018Applicant waived her right to 15 days of notice.
- Decision dateMar 29, 2018
Cite For
- Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B
- Renunciation of Foreign Citizenship as a Mitigating Factor Under Guideline C
- Oversights in Personal Conduct Disclosures Not Constituting Disqualifying Behavior Under Guideline E