Summary
Darlene D. Lokey Anderson, an Administrative Judge, denied a security clearance application for a 45-year-old defense contractor due to financial considerations under Guideline F. The applicant admitted to approximately $76,236 in significant delinquent debts, including consumer debts and back taxes, and failed to demonstrate responsible financial management despite some efforts to address these obligations.
The applicant had several outstanding consumer debts, including a bank account with a past due amount of $6,301 and a total balance of $450,109 for home repairs, which remained unresolved. Other consumer debts, ranging from $956 to $7,595, were either in collection, charged off, or subject to payment arrangements, with some showing evidence of recent resolution or payment in full. However, significant federal tax debts for 2012 and 2013, totaling $20,036 and $18,894 respectively, remained largely outstanding despite claimed installment agreements.
While several state tax levies from 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2017, ranging from $643.79 to $5,785.14, were shown to be paid in full through garnishment records, the applicant's overall financial history demonstrated excessive indebtedness and poor judgment. Although personal circumstances contributed to the financial issues, the applicant did not adjust spending accordingly, leading to the denial of the security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- Applicant has a history of excessive indebtedness, demonstrating unreliability and poor judgment.
- Despite some debt resolution efforts, the applicant remains significantly indebted to the Federal Government.
- The applicant's financial issues were exacerbated by personal circumstances, but he did not adjust his spending accordingly.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability or Unwillingness to Satisfy Debts
- AG ¶ 19(b)raisedUnwillingness to Satisfy Debt Regardless of the Ability to Do So
- AG ¶ 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- AG ¶ 19(g)raisedFailure to File Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax Returns as Required
- AG ¶ 20(c)rejectedThe Individual Has Received or Is Receiving Financial CounselingWhile the applicant contacted a credit counseling firm, the judge found insufficient evidence of responsible financial management.
- AG ¶ 20(d)rejectedThe Individual Initiated and Is Adhering to a Good-faith Effort to Repay Overdue CreditorsThe applicant's late efforts to resolve debts did not demonstrate a pattern of responsibility.
Key Rule Quoted
“Failure to live within one's means, satisfy debts, and meet financial obligations may indicate poor self-control, lack of judgment, or unwillingness to abide by rules and regulations, all of which can raise questions about an individual's reliability, trustworthiness, and ability to protect classified or sensitive information.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedApr 26, 2017
- Answer filedMay 16, 2017Applicant requested a decision on the written record.
- Hearing held—No hearing; decision made on the written record.
- Decision dateMar 28, 2018
Cite For
- Denial of Security Clearance Due to Significant Financial Obligations Under Guideline F
- Insufficient Evidence of Responsible Financial Management Despite Some Debt Resolution Efforts
- Impact of Personal Circumstances on Financial Behavior and Judgment