Summary
A 38-year-old interpreter-linguist, born in Ukraine, was granted a security clearance despite initial concerns under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) and Guideline E (Personal Conduct). The Statement of Reasons highlighted several foreign ties, including the applicant's parents, brother, in-laws, and cousins all being citizens and residents of Ukraine. Additionally, the applicant had financial ties to Ukraine, including potential real estate inheritance.
Disqualifying conditions under Guideline B were raised, specifically regarding immediate family members and other relatives who are citizens of a foreign country, and financial interests in a foreign country. However, the applicant successfully mitigated these concerns.
The judge found that the applicant demonstrated strong ties to the U.S., including honorable military service. Furthermore, the applicant's family members in Ukraine were not affiliated with any government or intelligence services, and any financial support provided to them was minimal and reasonable. Ultimately, the judge determined that the applicant posed minimal risk of foreign influence, leading to the security clearance being granted.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant has strong ties to the U.S. and has served honorably in the military.
- The applicant's family members in Ukraine are not affiliated with the government or intelligence services.
- The applicant's financial support to family members was minimal and reasonable under the circumstances.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with Foreign Family Members
- AG ¶ 7(b)raisedConnections to Foreign Persons Creating Potential Conflict of Interest
- AG ¶ 7(f)raisedSubstantial Business or Financial Interests in a Foreign Country
- AG ¶ 8(a)appliedNature of Relationships with Foreign Persons Unlikely to Create Conflict
- AG ¶ 8(b)appliedMinimal Conflict of Interest Due to Strong U.S. Ties
- AG ¶ 8(c)appliedCasual and Infrequent Contact with Foreign Citizens
Key Rule Quoted
“The United States has a compelling interest in protecting and safeguarding classified information from any person, organization, or country that is not authorized to have access to it, regardless of whether that person, organization, or country has interests inimical to those of the United States.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedOct 5, 2017
- Answer filedNov 17, 2017Applicant elected to proceed on the written record.
- Hearing heldN/ANo hearing; decided on written record.
- Decision dateJun 21, 2018
Cite For
- Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B
- Consideration of Familial Ties in Security Clearance Decisions
- Whole-person Concept in Evaluating Security Clearance Eligibility