Summary
A 52-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen, originally from Taiwan, was granted a security clearance despite initial concerns under Guideline B (Foreign Influence). The Statement of Reasons detailed that the applicant's parents and two sisters are citizens and residents of Taiwan, with the applicant having weekly contact with his parents and providing them approximately $10,000 annually in financial support. He also had quarterly to monthly contact with his sisters. Additionally, the applicant's parents-in-law are citizens and residents of the People's Republic of China, with whom he had telephonic contact about every three months.
These facts raised disqualifying conditions under Adjudicative Guidelines (AG) ¶ 7(a) and AG ¶ 7(b). However, the applicant successfully mitigated these concerns by demonstrating strong ties to the U.S. and a commitment to national interests, applying mitigating condition AG ¶ 8(b).
The decision to grant the clearance was based on several factors. The applicant has resided in the U.S. since 1990, establishing deep personal and professional connections. He holds no foreign investments or property, with all his financial interests located within the U.S. Furthermore, his colleagues highly regard his character and work ethic, indicating reliability.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant has lived in the U.S. since 1990 and has established deep personal and professional ties here.
- He has no foreign investments or property, and all his financial interests are in the U.S.
- The applicant's character and work ethic are highly regarded by colleagues, indicating reliability.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with Foreign Family MembersThe applicant's relationships with family members in Taiwan and the PRC create a potential conflict of interest.
- AG ¶ 7(b)raisedConnections to Foreign PersonsThe applicant's connections create a potential conflict of interest regarding classified information.
- AG ¶ 8(b)appliedMinimal Conflict of InterestThe applicant's longstanding relationships and loyalty to the U.S. outweigh potential conflicts.
Key Rule Quoted
“The United States has a compelling interest in protecting and safeguarding [sensitive] information from any person, organization, or country that is not authorized to have access to it, regardless of whether that person, organization, or country has interests inimical to those of the United States.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedOct 18, 2017
- Answer filedNov 2, 2017
- Hearing heldFeb 21, 2018
- Decision dateJul 10, 2018
Cite For
- Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B
- Importance of Deep Personal and Professional Ties to the U.S.
- Consideration of the Whole-person Concept in Security Clearance Determinations.