Summary
A 61-year-old defense contractor employee was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct), Guideline G (Alcohol Consumption), and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The denial stemmed primarily from the applicant's intentional falsification of material facts on his 2004 Security Clearance Application (SCA) and a history of alcohol-related issues.
Specifically, the applicant falsely stated on his SCA that he had not been charged with or convicted of any alcohol or drug-related offenses, despite a prior DUI arrest. He also falsely claimed he had not received any alcohol-related treatment or counseling, when he had attended group therapy sessions. The judge found these misrepresentations to be deliberate attempts to conceal alcohol-related problems, reflecting adversely on his judgment and reliability.
While the applicant had consumed alcohol to intoxication during a one-week period in early 2001, there was no credible evidence of intoxication since then, and he had never been diagnosed with alcoholism. However, the intentional falsification of the SCA was a critical factor, leading to the denial of his security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- Applicant intentionally falsified material facts on his Security Clearance Application (SCA).
- The applicant's explanations for his false responses were not credible, indicating an attempt to conceal alcohol-related problems.
- The applicant's conduct reflects adversely on his judgment and reliability.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.A5.1.2.2appliedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant and Material Facts From Any Personnel Security Questionnaire.
- E2.A7.1.2.5raisedHabitual or Binge Consumption of Alcohol to the Point of Impaired Judgment.
- E2.A7.1.2.6rejectedEvidence of Alcohol Consumption to Intoxication.Insufficient evidence to establish recent alcohol consumption to intoxication.
- E2.A7.1.3.2appliedThe Problem Occurred a Number of Years Ago and There Is No Indication of a Recent Problem.
Key Rule Quoted
“When such an individual intentionally falsifies material facts on a security clearance application, it is extremely difficult to conclude that he or she nevertheless possesses the good judgment, reliability and trustworthiness required of clearance holders.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJun 23, 2006
- Answer filedJul 25, 2006
- Hearing heldNov 7, 2006
- Decision dateJan 24, 2007
Cite For
- Intentional Falsification of Material Facts on a Security Clearance Application Under Guideline E
- Impact of Alcohol-related Conduct on Security Clearance Eligibility Under Guideline G
- Criminal Implications of Falsification Under Guideline J.