Summary
A 30-year-old U.S. citizen linguist was granted a security clearance despite initial concerns under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) due to family ties in Afghanistan. The Statement of Reasons detailed that the applicant's mother, two sisters, and one brother are Afghan citizens and residents. The applicant's mother, a U.S. permanent resident, provides financial support to his sisters in Afghanistan, and the applicant also sends monthly funds to family members there. Additionally, the applicant sent $20,000 to his mother in Afghanistan and purchased land in the country. Three of his siblings have applied to emigrate to the United States.
Disqualifying conditions under Guideline B were raised, specifically AG ¶ 7(a), AG ¶ 7(b), and AG ¶ 7(d). However, the judge applied mitigating conditions AG ¶ 8(a), AG ¶ 8(b), and AG ¶ 8(c).
The clearance was granted because the applicant honorably served as a linguist in a dangerous environment for five years. The judge also noted the applicant's substantial connections to the United States, including family support and financial investments, and that his mother is a U.S. permanent resident, which collectively mitigated the foreign influence concerns.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant served honorably as a linguist in a dangerous environment for five years.
- The applicant has substantial connections to the United States, including family support and financial investments.
- The applicant's mother is a U.S. permanent resident, reducing foreign influence concerns.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with Foreign Family Members
- AG ¶ 7(b)raisedConnections to Foreign Persons
- AG ¶ 7(d)raisedSharing Living Quarters with Foreign Citizens
- AG ¶ 8(a)appliedU.S. Citizenship
- AG ¶ 8(b)appliedFamily Ties in the U.S.
- AG ¶ 8(c)appliedNo Foreign Financial Interests
Key Rule Quoted
“The mere possession of close family ties with one or more family members living in Afghanistan is not, as a matter of law, disqualifying under Guideline B; however, if an applicant has a close relationship with even one relative living in a foreign country, this factor alone is sufficient to create the potential for foreign influence and could potentially result in the compromise of classified information.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJun 30, 2016
- Answer filedJul 22, 2016
- Hearing heldFeb 13, 2017Applicant waived his right to 15 days notice.
- Decision dateMar 23, 2017
Cite For
- Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Due to U.S. Citizenship
- Significance of Family Ties in Security Clearance Determinations
- Impact of Honorable Military Service on Clearance Eligibility