ISCR Case 06-23112.h1

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 06-23112.h1

deniedAug 30, 2007· Hon. Martin H. Mogul· hearing

Summary

A 47-year-old defense contractor was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct), Guideline F (Financial Considerations), and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The denial stemmed from a combination of financial difficulties, a criminal record, and significant misrepresentations on his Security Clearance Application (SCA).

Specifically, the applicant failed to disclose a 1979 felony conviction for unlawful transfer of a firearm, for which he received a suspended sentence and probation. He also provided inaccurate information regarding multiple overdue debts, some of which he claimed were paid but lacked evidence, and others he did not recognize or had made minimal payments on. While he credibly denied a garnishment and judgment related to one debt, he admitted to being aware of some overdue debts, stating he "did not think that it was going to be dug into that far."

The government found that the applicant provided materially incorrect information on his SCA, a violation of Federal Law, Title 18, U.S.C. Section 1001. This undermined his credibility, and despite some efforts to address financial obligations, mitigation of the security concerns was not established, leading to the denial.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant provided materially incorrect information on his Security Clearance Application, violating Federal Law, Title 18, U.S.C. Section 1001.
The applicant's credibility was suspect due to the inaccuracies in his financial disclosures.
Mitigation of security concerns was not established despite some efforts to address financial obligations.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

E2.A2.1appliedDeliberate Omission or Falsification of Relevant Facts
F3.AraisedHistory of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
F3.CraisedUnwillingness to Satisfy Debts
J1.AappliedA Single Serious Crime

Mitigating

F2.BappliedConditions That Resulted in Financial Problems Were Largely Beyond the Person's Control
F2.DappliedGood-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors or Resolve Debts

Key Rule Quoted

“"A person who seeks access to classified information enters into a fiduciary relationship with the U.S. Government that is predicated upon trust and confidence."”
— Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 531 (1988)

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedMar 12, 2007
Answer filedMay 21, 2007Applicant responded in writing to the SOR allegations.
Hearing heldAug 16, 2007Hearing conducted with no witnesses called.
Decision dateAug 30, 2007

Cite For

Credibility Issues Related to Financial Disclosures Under Guideline F
Deliberate Omissions on Security Clearance Applications Under Guideline E
Criminal Conduct Related to False Statements Under Guideline J

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Conduct	Concealed Issue	Response	Disqualifying (¶16)	Mitigating applied (¶17)	Mitigation
2.a	Question #21 asks, “Have you ever been charged with or convicted of any felony offense?” He was instructed to “report information regardless of whether the record in your case was sealed or otherwise stricken from the record.” Question #22 asks, “Have you ever been charged with or convicted of a firearms or explosive offense?” Applicant answered “No” to these two questions, even though he was arrested on March 29, 1979 and charged with Unlawful Sale of a Firearm, a felony offense. He was found guilty of unlawful Transfer of Firearm with ID, a felony offense, and he was sentenced to six months in the house of Corrections, suspended, and he was placed on one year probation.	Against Applicant	Falsification Security FormFOUND DELIBERATE	Criminal Conduct	Denied	(a) deliberate omission, concealment, or falsification on a security form	—	—
2.b	Question #34 asks, “In the last 7 years, have you had your wages garnished for any reason?” Question #37 asks, “In the last 7 years, have you had you had any judgements against you that have not been paid?” Applicant answered “No” to these questions. As discussed in 1.a., above, Applicant testified credibly that no garnishment was ever placed against him, nor was he aware of any judgement against him.	Against Applicant	Falsification Security FormFOUND DELIBERATE	—	Denied	(a) deliberate omission, concealment, or falsification on a security form	—	—
2.c	Question #38 asks, “In the last 7 years, have you been over 180 days delinquent on any debt(s)?” “No” was checked off for this question. Clearly, at the time he completed the SCA, Applicant was or had been delinquent on all the debts listed on the SOR, and all of these debts should have been included.	Against Applicant	Falsification Security FormFOUND DELIBERATE	—	Denied	(a) deliberate omission, concealment, or falsification on a security form	—	—
2.d	Question #39 asks, “Are you currently over 90 days delinquent on any debt(s)?”“No” was answered on this question and again no debts were listed. At the time he completed the SCA, Applicant was still delinquent on the debts listed on the SOR, and these debts should have been included. Applicant admitted that he was aware of some overdue debts although not all of them. His limited explanation during his testimony was, “I did not think that it was going to be dug into that far.”	Against Applicant	Falsification Security FormFOUND DELIBERATE	—	Denied	(a) deliberate omission, concealment, or falsification on a security form	—	—

Allegation

Finding

Conduct

Concealed Issue

Response

Disqualifying (¶16)

Mitigating applied (¶17)

Mitigation

2.a

Question #21 asks, “Have you ever been charged with or convicted of any felony offense?” He was instructed to “report information regardless of whether the record in your case was sealed or otherwise stricken from the record.” Question #22 asks, “Have you ever been charged with or convicted of a firearms or explosive offense?” Applicant answered “No” to these two questions, even though he was arrested on March 29, 1979 and charged with Unlawful Sale of a Firearm, a felony offense. He was found guilty of unlawful Transfer of Firearm with ID, a felony offense, and he was sentenced to six months in the house of Corrections, suspended, and he was placed on one year probation.

Against Applicant

Falsification Security FormFOUND DELIBERATE

Criminal Conduct

Denied

(a) deliberate omission, concealment, or falsification on a security form

—

2.b

Question #34 asks, “In the last 7 years, have you had your wages garnished for any reason?” Question #37 asks, “In the last 7 years, have you had you had any judgements against you that have not been paid?” Applicant answered “No” to these questions. As discussed in 1.a., above, Applicant testified credibly that no garnishment was ever placed against him, nor was he aware of any judgement against him.

Against Applicant

Falsification Security FormFOUND DELIBERATE

—

Denied

(a) deliberate omission, concealment, or falsification on a security form

—

2.c

Question #38 asks, “In the last 7 years, have you been over 180 days delinquent on any debt(s)?” “No” was checked off for this question. Clearly, at the time he completed the SCA, Applicant was or had been delinquent on all the debts listed on the SOR, and all of these debts should have been included.

Against Applicant

Falsification Security FormFOUND DELIBERATE

—

Denied

(a) deliberate omission, concealment, or falsification on a security form

—

2.d

Question #39 asks, “Are you currently over 90 days delinquent on any debt(s)?”“No” was answered on this question and again no debts were listed. At the time he completed the SCA, Applicant was still delinquent on the debts listed on the SOR, and these debts should have been included. Applicant admitted that he was aware of some overdue debts although not all of them. His limited explanation during his testimony was, “I did not think that it was going to be dug into that far.”

Against Applicant

Falsification Security FormFOUND DELIBERATE

—

Denied

(a) deliberate omission, concealment, or falsification on a security form

—

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	This overdue debt to Creditor 1 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $4,372. This debt is alleged to be for a judgement entered against Applicant’s on December 1, 1998, which resulted in a garnishment order against him in the amount of $6,565.27. Applicant testified that he paid this debt sometime in 1995. He also contended that no garnishment was ever placed against him, nor was he aware of any judgement against him. Applicant testified that he had no evidence to establish evidence of payment of this debt, as the 1995 house fire destroyed many of his records. $4,372	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Denied	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.b	This overdue debt to Creditor 2 is in the amount of $893. Applicant claimed that he did not recognize this debt, nor has he been able to get verification of its origin. He has made no payment on this debt. $893	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Denied	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.c	This overdue debt to Creditor 3 is in the amount of $122. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. Exhibit 8, a credit report, dated August 15, 2007, shows that this debt was paid. $122	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.d	This overdue debt to Creditor 4 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $617. Although Applicant testified that this debt has been paid, he offered no evidence to establish that this debt was resolved. The record was held open to allow Applicant to offer evidence of payment, but no evidence was ever introduced. $617	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.e	This overdue debt to Creditor 5 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $625. Applicant claimed that he did not recognize this debt, nor has he been able to get verification of its origin. He has made no payment on this debt. $625	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Denied	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.f	This overdue debt to Creditor 6 is listed in the SOR is in the amount of $84. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. Exhibit 8 establishes that this debt was paid. $84	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.g	This overdue debt to Creditor 7 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $92. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid, but again he offered no evidence to establish that this debt was resolved. The record was held open to allow Applicant to offer evidence of payment, but no evidence was ever introduced. $92	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.h	This overdue debt to Creditor 8 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $48. Applicant testified that he believed that this debt has been paid, but offered no evidence to establish that this debt was resolved. The record was held open to allow Applicant to offer evidence of payment, but no evidence was ever introduced. $48	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.i	This overdue debt to Creditor 9 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $138. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid, but offered no evidence to establish that this debt was resolved. The record was held open to allow Applicant to offer evidence of payment, but no evidence was ever introduced. $138	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.j	This overdue debt to Creditor 10 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $57. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. Exhibit 8 establishes that this debt was paid. $57	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.k	This overdue debt to Creditor 11 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $5,410. Applicant testified that he made one payment of $100 on this debt in May 2007, and the total now owed is $5,310. $5,410	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.l	This overdue debt to Creditor 12 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $4,290. Applicant testified that he made one payment of $100 on this debt in June 2007, and the total now owed is $4,190. $4,290	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.m	This overdue debt to Creditor 13 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $218. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. However, Exhibit 8 shows that this debt was unpaid. The record was held open to allow Applicant to offer evidence of payment, but no evidence was ever introduced. $218	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.n	This overdue debt to Creditor 14 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $119. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. Exhibit 8 establishes that this debt was paid. $119	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.o	This overdue debt to Creditor 15 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $203. Applicant testified that this debt has not been paid. $203	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.p	This overdue debt to Creditor 16 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $45. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. Exhibit 8 establishes that this debt was paid. $45	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.q	This overdue debt to Creditor 17 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $319. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. Exhibit 8 establishes that this debt was paid. $319	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.r	This overdue debt to Creditor 18 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $22. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid, but offered no evidence to establish that this debt was resolved. The record was held open to allow Applicant to offer evidence of payment, but no evidence was ever introduced. $22	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—
1.s	This overdue debt to Creditor 19 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $374. Applicant testified that this debt has not been paid. $374	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	—

Allegation

Finding

Type

Response

Disqualifying (¶19)

Mitigating applied (¶20)

Mitigation

1.a

This overdue debt to Creditor 1 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $4,372. This debt is alleged to be for a judgement entered against Applicant’s on December 1, 1998, which resulted in a garnishment order against him in the amount of $6,565.27. Applicant testified that he paid this debt sometime in 1995. He also contended that no garnishment was ever placed against him, nor was he aware of any judgement against him. Applicant testified that he had no evidence to establish evidence of payment of this debt, as the 1995 house fire destroyed many of his records.

$4,372

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Denied

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.b

This overdue debt to Creditor 2 is in the amount of $893. Applicant claimed that he did not recognize this debt, nor has he been able to get verification of its origin. He has made no payment on this debt.

$893

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Denied

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.c

This overdue debt to Creditor 3 is in the amount of $122. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. Exhibit 8, a credit report, dated August 15, 2007, shows that this debt was paid.

$122

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.d

This overdue debt to Creditor 4 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $617. Although Applicant testified that this debt has been paid, he offered no evidence to establish that this debt was resolved. The record was held open to allow Applicant to offer evidence of payment, but no evidence was ever introduced.

$617

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.e

This overdue debt to Creditor 5 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $625. Applicant claimed that he did not recognize this debt, nor has he been able to get verification of its origin. He has made no payment on this debt.

$625

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Denied

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.f

This overdue debt to Creditor 6 is listed in the SOR is in the amount of $84. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. Exhibit 8 establishes that this debt was paid.

$84

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.g

This overdue debt to Creditor 7 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $92. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid, but again he offered no evidence to establish that this debt was resolved. The record was held open to allow Applicant to offer evidence of payment, but no evidence was ever introduced.

$92

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.h

This overdue debt to Creditor 8 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $48. Applicant testified that he believed that this debt has been paid, but offered no evidence to establish that this debt was resolved. The record was held open to allow Applicant to offer evidence of payment, but no evidence was ever introduced.

$48

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.i

This overdue debt to Creditor 9 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $138. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid, but offered no evidence to establish that this debt was resolved. The record was held open to allow Applicant to offer evidence of payment, but no evidence was ever introduced.

$138

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.j

This overdue debt to Creditor 10 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $57. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. Exhibit 8 establishes that this debt was paid.

$57

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.k

This overdue debt to Creditor 11 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $5,410. Applicant testified that he made one payment of $100 on this debt in May 2007, and the total now owed is $5,310.

$5,410

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.l

This overdue debt to Creditor 12 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $4,290. Applicant testified that he made one payment of $100 on this debt in June 2007, and the total now owed is $4,190.

$4,290

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.m

This overdue debt to Creditor 13 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $218. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. However, Exhibit 8 shows that this debt was unpaid. The record was held open to allow Applicant to offer evidence of payment, but no evidence was ever introduced.

$218

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.n

This overdue debt to Creditor 14 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $119. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. Exhibit 8 establishes that this debt was paid.

$119

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.o

This overdue debt to Creditor 15 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $203. Applicant testified that this debt has not been paid.

$203

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.p

This overdue debt to Creditor 16 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $45. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. Exhibit 8 establishes that this debt was paid.

$45

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.q

This overdue debt to Creditor 17 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $319. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid. Exhibit 8 establishes that this debt was paid.

$319

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.r

This overdue debt to Creditor 18 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $22. Applicant testified that this debt has been paid, but offered no evidence to establish that this debt was resolved. The record was held open to allow Applicant to offer evidence of payment, but no evidence was ever introduced.

$22

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

1.s

This overdue debt to Creditor 19 is listed in the SOR in the amount of $374. Applicant testified that this debt has not been paid.

$374

For Applicant

Unspecified Financial

Admitted

(a) inability to satisfy debts

(c) a history of not meeting financial obligations

(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly

(d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts

—

¶	Allegation	Finding	Offense	Criminal disposition	Response	Disqualifying (¶31)	Mitigating applied (¶32)	Mitigation
3.a	The Government alleges in this paragraph that Applicant is ineligible for clearance because he furnished information on a SCA in 2005 to the Government that was not complete and truthful, which is a violation of Federal Law, Title 18, United States Code Section 1001.	Against Applicant	Fraud or Deception Criminal	Conduct No Charge	Unknown	(a) pattern of minor offenses casting doubt on judgment/reliability	—	—

Allegation

Finding

Offense

Criminal disposition

Response

Disqualifying (¶31)

Mitigating applied (¶32)

Mitigation

3.a

The Government alleges in this paragraph that Applicant is ineligible for clearance because he furnished information on a SCA in 2005 to the Government that was not complete and truthful, which is a violation of Federal Law, Title 18, United States Code Section 1001.

Against Applicant

Fraud or Deception Criminal

Conduct No Charge

Unknown

(a) pattern of minor offenses casting doubt on judgment/reliability

—

Loading case…

Case Profile

Summary

Why the Applicant Was Denied

Conditions Referenced

Key Rule Quoted

Procedural Posture

Cite For

Full decision

DEFENSE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

HEARING

SYNOPSIS

APPEARANCES

STATEMENT OF CASE

FINDINGS OF FACT

POLICIES

CONCLUSION

FORMAL FINDINGS

DECISION