Summary
A 30-year-old server administrator for a defense contractor was granted a security clearance despite concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The applicant had admitted to being charged with inappropriate sexual activity with younger siblings at age fifteen, resulting in placement in a youth offender program and counseling. Additionally, the applicant faced multiple criminal charges, including driving offenses and an arrest for assault and battery.
The Statement of Reasons also noted the applicant's denial of deliberately failing to list the sexual activity charge on Navy enlistment papers and an assault and battery arrest on an April 2007 security clearance application. Disqualifying conditions under Adjudicative Guidelines (AG) ¶ 16(a), AG ¶ 31(a), and AG ¶ 31(c) were raised.
However, the judge applied mitigating conditions under AG ¶ 17(c), AG ¶ 17(d), and AG ¶ 32(d). The applicant demonstrated significant rehabilitation, including ongoing counseling and stable employment, with no further inappropriate behavior over time. Credible explanations were provided for the omissions on security clearance applications, indicating no intent to deceive. Based on these factors, the security clearance was granted.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant demonstrated significant rehabilitation over the years since the incidents, including ongoing counseling and stable employment.
- The applicant's past conduct was mitigated by the passage of time and the absence of further inappropriate behavior.
- The applicant provided credible explanations for omissions on security clearance applications, indicating no intent to deceive.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 16(a)raisedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant and Material Facts
- AG ¶ 31(a)raisedA Single Serious Crime or Multiple Lesser Offenses
- AG ¶ 31(c)raisedAllegation or Admission of Criminal Conduct
- AG ¶ 17(c)appliedThe Offense Is so Minor, or so Much Time Has Passed, or the Behavior Is so Infrequent, or It Happened Under Such Unique Circumstances That It Is Unlikely to Recur
- AG ¶ 17(d)appliedThe Individual Has Acknowledged the Behavior and Obtained Counseling to Change the Behavior
- AG ¶ 32(d)appliedThere Is Evidence of Successful Rehabilitation
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedMar 28, 2008
- Answer filedMay 30, 2008
- Hearing heldNov 19, 2008
- Decision dateDec 19, 2008
Cite For
- Mitigation of Past Criminal Conduct Under Guideline J Due to Rehabilitation
- Consideration of the Passage of Time in Assessing Personal Conduct Under Guideline E
- The Importance of Credible Explanations for Omissions in Security Clearance Applications