Summary
The applicant, a 44-year-old technician for a defense contractor, faced security clearance denial due to financial considerations and personal conduct issues. Despite resolving most of her debts, the applicant intentionally omitted significant financial information on her security clearance application, leading to questions about her reliability and trustworthiness. The judge found the applicant's financial issues mitigated but ruled against her on personal conduct, resulting in a denial of her security clearance.
Under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations), the Statement of Reasons alleged the following: On August 24, 2007, Applicant completed a security clearance application (SCA). In response to question 27 requiring information about having liens placed against Applicant’s property in the last 7 years, she answered “No,” even though a lien was placed against her in December 2004 and one in April 2007 (2.a). Applicant also answered “No” to question 28A, requiring information about having any debts over 180 days delinquent in the last 7 years (2.b). $8,913, federal tax lien (1.a). $4,028, state tax lien (1.b). $6,429, judgment (1.c). $1,622, credit card (1.d). $1,578, medical account (1.e). $116, medical account (1.f). $583, medical account (1.g). $513, medical account (1.h). $127, medical account (1.i). $315, medical account (1.j). $453, medical account (1.k). $8,345, credit card (1.l).
The judge denied the clearance. The government raised disqualifying conditions PC DC ¶16.a. The judge applied mitigating conditions FC MC ¶20.d, FC MC ¶20.c, FC MC ¶20.a. The decision turned on the following: The applicant intentionally omitted significant financial information from her security clearance application; The applicant's lack of candor raised questions about her reliability and trustworthiness; The applicant provided no independent evidence of good character or job performance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant intentionally omitted significant financial information from her security clearance application.
- The applicant's lack of candor raised questions about her reliability and trustworthiness.
- The applicant provided no independent evidence of good character or job performance.
Conditions Referenced
- PC DC ¶16.aappliedDeliberate Omission or Falsification of Relevant Facts
- FC MC ¶20.dappliedGood-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors
- FC MC ¶20.cappliedReceived or Is Receiving Counseling for the Problem
- FC MC ¶20.aappliedBehavior Unlikely to Recur
Key Rule Quoted
“A person who seeks access to classified information enters into a fiduciary relationship with the government predicated upon trust and confidence.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedApr 17, 2008
- Answer filedMay 13, 2008
- Hearing held—Decision made on the record in lieu of a hearing.
- Decision dateMay 4, 2009
Cite For
- Intentional Omission of Financial Information Under Guideline E
- Mitigating Conditions for Financial Issues Under Guideline F
- Impact of Personal Conduct on Security Clearance Eligibility