Summary
A 56-year-old production test supervisor for a defense contractor was denied a security clearance under Guideline D (Sexual Behavior) and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct) due to two incidents of criminal sexual behavior. The first incident occurred in January 2004, when the applicant exposed himself and masturbated in front of an undercover police officer in a park. The second incident, in December 2006, involved the applicant masturbating nude in his kitchen with open doors, visible to a passing juvenile.
For the 2006 incident, the applicant was arrested for lewd and lascivious acts in the presence of a minor, a felony, but later pled guilty to a third-degree child abuse misdemeanor. He was sentenced to five years probation and ordered to attend sex offender therapy group counseling.
Despite the applicant's admissions and some evidence of rehabilitation, the judge determined that the security concerns were not sufficiently mitigated. The denial was based on the applicant's ongoing probation and the recent nature of the offenses, indicating insufficient evidence that the behavior would not recur.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant admitted to two incidents of criminal sexual behavior, which raised significant security concerns.
- The applicant is currently on probation for his offenses, indicating ongoing risk.
- The judge found that the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence of successful rehabilitation or that the behavior would not recur.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 13(a)raisedSexual Behavior of a Criminal Nature
- AG ¶ 31(a)raisedA Single Serious Crime or Multiple Lesser Offenses
- AG ¶ 31(d)raisedIndividual Is Currently on Parole or Probation
- AG ¶ 14(b)rejectedThe Sexual Behavior Happened so Long Ago, so Infrequently, or Under Such Unusual CircumstancesThe incidents occurred within a recent timeframe and the applicant is still on probation.
- AG ¶ 32(a)rejectedSo Much Time Has Elapsed Since the Criminal Behavior HappenedThe applicant's offenses occurred within the last few years, and he has not demonstrated sufficient rehabilitation.
- AG ¶ 32(d)rejectedEvidence of Successful RehabilitationWhile the applicant completed a treatment program, it was too soon to determine successful rehabilitation.
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedDec 4, 2009
- Answer filedDec 17, 2009
- Hearing heldMar 11, 2010
- Decision dateApr 27, 2010
Cite For
- Security Concerns Related to Criminal Sexual Behavior Under Guideline D and J
- The Impact of Ongoing Probation on Security Clearance Eligibility
- The Importance of Demonstrating Successful Rehabilitation for Mitigating Security Concerns