Summary
A 79-year-old U.S. citizen, holding dual citizenship with Israel, was denied a security clearance under Guidelines B (Foreign Influence), C (Foreign Preference), and E (Personal Conduct). The denial stemmed from concerns regarding the applicant's substantial financial interests and property in Israel, valued at approximately $56 million, which raised questions about potential foreign influence and divided loyalties.
The applicant had renewed his Israeli passport in 2006, which was valid until 2016, and had used it to enter and leave Israel since that time. Prior to October 2006, he used his U.S. passport for travel to Israel. Although the applicant stated he would relinquish his Israeli citizenship to obtain the clearance, he possessed a valid Israeli passport when he met with the investigator.
The judge ultimately denied the application, citing the applicant's significant financial ties and property ownership in Israel, his dual citizenship, and his connections to a high-ranking Israeli government official and a philanthropic foundation in Israel. These factors collectively heightened the risk of foreign exploitation and presented an unacceptable security risk.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant has significant financial interests in Israel, including ownership of properties valued at approximately $56 million.
- The applicant's dual citizenship with Israel raises concerns about divided loyalties and potential foreign influence.
- The applicant's connections to a high-ranking official in the Israeli government and a philanthropic foundation in Israel heighten the risk of foreign exploitation.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with Foreign Family Members or Associates
- AG ¶ 7(b)raisedConnections to Foreign Persons or Governments
- AG ¶ 7(e)raisedSubstantial Business Interests in a Foreign Country
- AG ¶ 10(a)raisedPossession of a Current Foreign Passport
- AG ¶ 8(a)rejectedNature of Relationships with Foreign PersonsThe applicant's relationships and interests in Israel were found to create a heightened risk of foreign influence.
- AG ¶ 8(b)rejectedMinimal Conflict of InterestThe applicant's substantial financial interests in Israel were deemed significant enough to pose a conflict.
- AG ¶ 8(c)rejectedCasual and Infrequent Contact with Foreign CitizensThe applicant's frequent travel to Israel and connections with Israeli officials were not considered casual.
Key Rule Quoted
“Any doubt concerning personnel being considered for access to classified information will be resolved in favor of national security.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedMar 8, 2010
- Answer filedMar 26, 2010Applicant requested a decision on the written record.
- Hearing held—No hearing was held; decision was made on the written record.
- Decision dateOct 6, 2010
Cite For
- Foreign Influence Due to Substantial Financial Interests in a Foreign Country
- Dual Citizenship Raising Concerns of Divided Loyalties
- Impact of Foreign Contacts on Security Clearance Eligibility