Summary
A 55-year-old Iranian-born U.S. citizen was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) and Guideline C (Foreign Preference). The applicant maintained dual citizenship with Iran and the U.K., and possessed a current Iranian passport, which he renewed and used for travel to and from Iran even after becoming a U.S. citizen in 2007. These actions raised disqualifying conditions related to foreign preference and potential conflicts of interest.
The Statement of Reasons highlighted the applicant's contact with foreign family members and connections to Iran, which were deemed to create a heightened risk of foreign exploitation, manipulation, and coercion. Despite the applicant expressing a willingness to relinquish his foreign passports if required for a security clearance, the judge found that his frequent travel to Iran, including after receiving the Statement of Reasons, indicated a preference for foreign ties over U.S. interests.
Ultimately, the judge concluded that the applicant's dual citizenship, continued use of his Iranian passport, and family connections in Iran posed an unacceptable security risk. While mitigating conditions were considered, they were insufficient to overcome the established security concerns, leading to the denial of the security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant maintained dual citizenship with Iran and the U.K., which raised security concerns under AG ¶ 10(a) and AG ¶ 7(a).
- The applicant traveled to Iran multiple times, including after receiving the SOR, indicating a preference for foreign ties over U.S. interests.
- The applicant's family connections in Iran created a heightened risk of foreign influence and coercion, as outlined in AG ¶ 7(b) and AG ¶ 7(d).
Conditions Referenced
- C10(a)raisedForeign Preference
- B7(a)raisedForeign Influence
- B7(b)raisedForeign Influence
- B7(d)raisedForeign Influence
- B7(e)raisedForeign Influence
- C11(e)appliedForeign PreferenceThe applicant surrendered his Iranian and U.K. passports to his security officer.
- B8(a)rejectedForeign InfluenceThe nature of the applicant's relationships with foreign persons did not mitigate the security concerns.
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJul 31, 2009
- Answer filedAug 14, 2009
- Hearing heldDec 15, 2009
- Decision dateJun 15, 2010
Cite For
- Security Concerns Regarding Dual Citizenship and Foreign Family Ties
- Impact of Foreign Travel on Security Clearance Eligibility
- Mitigating Conditions Related to Foreign Influence and Preference