Summary
A 50-year-old senior engineer and veteran with 20 years of military service was granted a security clearance despite concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The applicant faced allegations of falsifying information on his October 7, 2008 e-QIP by answering "no" to questions regarding delinquencies over 180 days and current delinquencies over 90 days.
His financial issues, totaling approximately $76,850 in delinquent debts, stemmed from his father-in-law's death and a significant reduction in his wife's income. These debts included a credit card from 2005 that became delinquent in 2007, another credit card delinquent in January 2008, a mobile home loan from 2002, a 60-day past due account with a discount hardware store, and a military credit card debt of $5,987 transferred for collection in August 2006.
The judge found that the applicant did not deliberately falsify information. The clearance was granted because the applicant settled three of his six delinquent debts, demonstrated plans to resolve the remaining accounts, and showed good faith efforts to manage his financial obligations, becoming more involved in family finances. His financial difficulties were largely attributed to circumstances beyond his control.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant settled three of six delinquent debts and has plans to resolve the remaining debts.
- The applicant's financial difficulties were largely due to circumstances beyond his control, including a significant reduction in his wife's income.
- The applicant demonstrated good faith efforts to manage his financial obligations and became more involved in family finances.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability or Unwillingness to Satisfy Debts
- AG ¶ 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- AG ¶ 20(a)appliedThe Behavior Happened so Long Ago, Was so Infrequent, or Occurred Under Such Circumstances That It Is Unlikely to Recur and Does Not Cast Doubt on the Individual’s Current Reliability, Trustworthiness, or Good Judgment
- AG ¶ 20(b)appliedThe Conditions That Resulted in the Financial Problem Were Largely Beyond the Person’s Control, and the Person Acted Responsibly Under the Circumstances
- AG ¶ 20(d)appliedThe Individual Initiated a Good-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors or Otherwise Resolve Debts
Key Rule Quoted
“The administrative judge's ultimate goal is to reach a fair and impartial decision that is based on common sense.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedFeb 23, 2010
- Answer filedMar 29, 2010
- Hearing heldJul 14, 2010
- Decision dateApr 15, 2011
Cite For
- Mitigation of Financial Issues Under Guideline F Due to Unforeseen Circumstances
- Non-deliberate Omission of Financial Information on E-qip Under Guideline E
- Good Faith Efforts to Resolve Delinquent Debts as a Mitigating Factor