Summary
A 33-year-old defense contractor was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations), Guideline G (Alcohol Consumption), and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The applicant had a history of alcohol abuse from approximately 1991 until at least February 2009, leading to at least four arrests over a ten-year period. These arrests included three for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) and one for domestic violence, with the most recent DUI arrest occurring in 2009, which resulted in his termination from a previous job.
Additionally, the applicant faced significant financial difficulties, with numerous delinquent debts. While he admitted to most of these debts and demonstrated efforts to resolve them, including paying off or satisfying all but two, and entering an installment agreement for an $8,169 debt, these efforts were not sufficient to mitigate the overall security concerns.
The judge determined that the applicant's extensive history of criminal conduct and alcohol-related incidents, despite some efforts to address his financial issues and alcohol dependence, raised significant concerns about his reliability and trustworthiness. Consequently, the application for a security clearance was denied.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant has a long history of alcohol abuse, including multiple DUI arrests and a domestic violence incident.
- The applicant's criminal conduct and alcohol-related incidents demonstrate poor judgment and unreliability.
- Despite some recent efforts to address his financial issues, the applicant's past behavior raises significant security concerns.
Conditions Referenced
- 19(a)raisedInability or Unwillingness to Satisfy Debts
- 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- 31(a)raisedA Single Serious Crime or Multiple Lesser Offenses
- 31(c)raisedAllegation or Admission of Criminal Conduct
- 22(a)raisedAlcohol-related Incidents Away From Work
- 22(c)raisedHabitual or Binge Consumption of Alcohol
- 22(e)raisedEvaluation of Alcohol Abuse or Dependence
- 20(c)appliedThe Person Has Received or Is Receiving Counseling for the Problem
- 20(d)appliedThe Individual Has Initiated a Good Faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors
Key Rule Quoted
“The adjudicative process is the careful weighing of a number of variables known as the whole-person concept.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedDec 22, 2010
- Answer filedJan 21, 2011
- Hearing heldMar 16, 2011
- Decision dateAug 23, 2011
Cite For
- Denial Based on Extensive History of Alcohol Abuse and Criminal Conduct Under Guidelines G and J
- Mitigating Conditions Applied but Insufficient to Overcome Disqualifying Conditions
- Whole-person Concept in Evaluating Security Clearance Eligibility