Summary
A 50-year-old fire watch for a defense contractor was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The applicant's Statement of Reasons detailed nine arrests and charges between October 1987 and December 2000, many of which were drug-related felonies. These included convictions for larceny of Government property, possession for sale of cocaine, selling a controlled narcotic substance, illegal possession of a narcotic, possession of a firearm by a felon, and another charge of selling a controlled narcotic substance.
The applicant also faced an allegation of falsifying his June 2010 security clearance application by omitting all of his arrests, charges, and convictions. While he mitigated the personal conduct concerns by demonstrating no intent to falsify the application, the extensive and severe nature of his criminal conduct remained a significant issue.
Ultimately, the security clearance was denied because the applicant's criminal history, spanning 14 years with multiple arrests and felony convictions, was deemed too recent and serious. This raised substantial doubts about his judgment, reliability, and trustworthiness, outweighing any mitigating factors presented.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant had a significant history of criminal conduct, including multiple arrests and felony convictions over a 14-year period.
- The severity of the applicant's offenses and their recurrence raised substantial doubts about his judgment, reliability, and trustworthiness.
- The applicant's criminal history was deemed too recent and serious to warrant a security clearance despite some mitigating factors.
Conditions Referenced
- DC ¶ 31(c)raisedAllegation or Admission of Criminal Conduct
- DC ¶ 31(e)raisedViolation of Parole or Probation
- DC ¶ 31(f)raisedConviction in a Federal or State Court, Including a Court-martial of a Crime, Sentenced to Imprisonment for a Term Exceeding One Year
- MC ¶ 32(a)appliedTime Elapsed Since Criminal BehaviorThe applicant demonstrated some rehabilitation due to the time elapsed since his last conviction.
- MC ¶ 32(d)appliedEvidence of Successful RehabilitationThe applicant showed evidence of personal development and positive contributions to his community.
- MC ¶ 17(a)appliedPrompt, Good-faith Efforts to Correct OmissionsThe applicant's explanations for omissions in his e-QIP were accepted as honest and not deliberate.
Key Rule Quoted
“A decision to grant or continue an applicant's security clearance may be made only upon a threshold finding that to do so is clearly consistent with the national interest.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedFeb 3, 2012
- Answer filedFeb 16, 2012
- Hearing heldMay 9, 2012
- Decision dateJun 7, 2012
Cite For
- Evaluation of Criminal Conduct Under Guideline J
- Mitigation of Personal Conduct Concerns Under Guideline E
- Consideration of Time Elapsed Since Criminal Behavior in Security Clearance Determinations