Summary
A 37-year-old defense contractor employee was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The denial stemmed from a significant history of criminal behavior, including multiple arrests and convictions, and the applicant's intentional omissions of this record from his security clearance application.
The applicant's criminal history included a conviction for felony unlawful wounding in 1995, resulting in a three-year prison sentence with most of it suspended, followed by probation. Other convictions included stalking and resisting arrest in 1999, assault and battery in 1998, and multiple contempt of court charges in 2006, one of which led to a six-month jail sentence. He was also convicted of stalking in 2006, public intoxication and disorderly conduct in 2007, and driving while intoxicated in 2008. While some charges, such as assault and battery on a family member in 2005, were dismissed, the pattern of misconduct was extensive.
The judge denied the clearance, specifically citing the applicant's intentional failure to disclose numerous arrests and convictions on his application. The serious nature of offenses like unlawful wounding and stalking, combined with the applicant's non-credible explanations for his omissions, led to concerns about his trustworthiness and potential for future misconduct.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant intentionally omitted multiple arrests and convictions from his security clearance application.
- The applicant's criminal history included serious offenses such as unlawful wounding and stalking, raising significant security concerns.
- The applicant's explanations for his omissions were not credible, undermining his trustworthiness.
Conditions Referenced
- J1raisedCriminal Conduct
- E2raisedFalsification of Information
- E2rejectedThe Applicant's Positive Work History and Character ReferencesThe judge found that the applicant's positive attributes did not outweigh the severity of his criminal history.
- J2rejectedThe Applicant's Efforts to Rehabilitate and Seek Restoration of RightsThe judge determined that the applicant's past conduct and omissions were too significant to mitigate.
Key Rule Quoted
“Eligibility for a security clearance is predicated upon the applicant meeting the criteria contained in the AG.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedFeb 19, 2014
- Answer filedMar 21, 2014
- Hearing heldMay 13, 2014
- Decision dateMay 29, 2014
Cite For
- Intentional Omissions of Criminal History as a Disqualifying Factor Under Guideline E
- Serious Criminal Conduct Impacting Security Clearance Eligibility Under Guideline J
- Credibility of Applicant's Explanations for Omissions in Security Clearance Applications.