Summary
A 54-year-old government contractor was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline H (Drug Involvement) and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The applicant had an extensive history of illegal stimulant use, including methamphetamine, speed, crystal meth, and ecstasy, from 1980 to 1996 and again from 2000 to 2008, reaching the point of addiction. To support this addiction, the applicant also sold these substances from 1988 to 1996 and 2000 to 2007.
The applicant's criminal record included numerous arrests and convictions. In February 2008, he was arrested for possession and use of a controlled substance and driving with a suspended license, resulting in a 270-day jail sentence and a modified probation from a prior 2006 arrest for similar drug offenses, which added a 365-day jail sentence. Other convictions included burglary in 2006, driving with a suspended license in 2005, obstructing an officer and drug use in 2003, exhibiting a deadly weapon in 2002, and multiple DUI alcohol offenses in 1999 and 1992.
Despite eight years of documented abstinence from illegal substances and positive character references, the judge determined that the applicant's long history of drug involvement and criminal conduct, including recent serious offenses, presented an unacceptable risk to national security. The judge concluded that the past conduct raised significant doubts about the applicant's reliability and trustworthiness, leading to the denial of the security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant had a long history of illegal drug use and sales spanning over 24 years, which raised significant security concerns.
- The applicant had multiple criminal convictions, including serious offenses, which were deemed too recent to mitigate security concerns.
- Despite eight years of abstinence from drugs, the judge concluded that the applicant's past conduct still posed a risk to national security.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 25(a)raisedDrug Abuse
- AG ¶ 25(c)raisedIllegal Drug Sale
- AG ¶ 31(a)raisedSerious Crime or Multiple Lesser Offenses
- AG ¶ 31(c)raisedAllegation or Admission of Criminal Conduct
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedOct 1, 2015
- Answer filedOct 30, 2015
- Hearing heldFeb 9, 2016Hearing conducted as scheduled.
- Decision dateApr 19, 2016
Cite For
- Impact of Extensive Criminal History on Security Clearance Eligibility
- Consideration of Past Drug Involvement in Security Clearance Decisions
- Importance of the Whole-person Concept in Adjudicating Security Clearance Cases