Summary
A 34-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen, originally from Kuwait and Jordan, was granted a security clearance despite concerns under Guideline B (Foreign Influence). The Statement of Reasons detailed several foreign connections. These included his mother, a U.S.-Jordanian dual citizen residing primarily in the U.S., with whom he has monthly phone contact and annual visits. Two brothers are citizens and residents of Jordan, with whom he has monthly phone contact but has not seen in at least three years.
Further connections included a sister, brother-in-law, and niece, all citizens and residents of Kuwait. The sister holds a Kuwaiti government service position, and the niece is a scientist working for the Kuwaiti government. The applicant sees these three individuals a few times a year. An allegation regarding a sister-in-law in Kuwait was credibly denied, appearing to be based on the niece. The applicant also has a professional contact, a Kuwaiti government employee, whom he met two years prior through work.
The security clearance was granted because the applicant successfully mitigated the foreign influence concerns. He demonstrated minimal contact with his foreign relatives due to work obligations and showed strong allegiance to the United States through his citizenship, voting, and tax compliance. It was determined that his family members' positions did not pose a significant risk of coercion or influence.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- Applicant demonstrated minimal contact with foreign relatives due to his work obligations.
- He has a strong allegiance to the United States, evidenced by his citizenship, voting, and tax compliance.
- The applicant's family members' positions do not pose a significant risk of coercion or influence.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with Foreign Family MembersContact with foreign family members creates a heightened risk of foreign exploitation.
- AG ¶ 7(b)raisedConnection to Foreign PersonsConnection to foreign persons creates a potential conflict of interest.
- AG ¶ 8(a)appliedNature of Relationships with Foreign PersonsThe nature of the applicant's relationships with foreign family members is such that it is unlikely he will have to choose between their interests and U.S. interests.
- AG ¶ 8(b)appliedNo Conflict of InterestThe applicant's loyalty to the U.S. is strong, minimizing any potential conflict of interest.
- AG ¶ 8(d)appliedForeign Contacts on U.S. Government BusinessThe applicant's foreign contacts are primarily professional and related to his work.
- AG ¶ 8(e)appliedPrompt Compliance with Reporting RequirementsThe applicant has consistently reported his foreign contacts and travel.
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedNov 6, 2013
- Answer filedDec 4, 2013Applicant admitted six of seven allegations.
- Hearing heldApr 16, 2014
- Decision dateApr 29, 2014
Cite For
- Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B
- Importance of Demonstrating Strong Ties to the U.S. in Security Clearance Cases
- Impact of Minimal Foreign Contact on Security Clearance Eligibility