Summary
A 29-year-old sheet metal worker was denied a security clearance under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) due to a pattern of falsifying information regarding his past illegal drug use and treatment. The applicant repeatedly provided untruthful responses on multiple security clearance forms and to a security investigator, failing to disclose the full extent of his drug history.
Specifically, on his June 9, 2009, e-QIP, the applicant stated he used opiates and cocaine only twice, omitting daily heroin use for at least a year in 2005-2006, and did not disclose 2006 treatment for heroin addiction. Similar omissions occurred on his December 1, 2011, e-QIP, where he admitted to only seven or eight instances of illegal drug use in 2006, again failing to mention daily heroin use.
In January 2012, he informed an investigator of only two instances of opiate or cocaine use in 2005 or 2006, and did not disclose his heroin addiction treatment. Further, on November 12, 2013, interrogatories, he only disclosed Vicodin and cocaine use on two occasions in 2005, omitting heroin and marijuana use, and did not disclose his 2006 counseling and rehabilitation for heroin addiction. The judge found his explanations for these omissions not credible, leading to the denial.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant provided false and misleading information regarding his drug use history on multiple security clearance applications.
- The applicant did not disclose the full extent of his illegal drug use or the treatment he received for drug addiction.
- The applicant's explanations for his omissions were not credible and did not mitigate the security concerns.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 16(a)raisedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant Facts
- AG ¶ 16(b)raisedDeliberately Providing False and Misleading Information
- AG ¶ 17(a)rejectedPrompt, Good-faith Efforts to Correct the OmissionThe applicant did not demonstrate prompt efforts to correct the misinformation before being confronted.
- AG ¶ 17(b)rejectedFailure to Cooperate Caused by Inadequate AdviceThe applicant's failure to provide accurate information was not significantly contributed to by inadequate advice.
Key Rule Quoted
“The security clearance system depends on the individual providing correct and accurate information.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJul 14, 2014
- Answer filedAug 3, 2014
- Hearing heldNov 17, 2014
- Decision dateJan 29, 2015
Cite For
- Issues of Falsification in Security Clearance Applications Under Guideline E
- Credibility Assessments in Personal Conduct Cases
- The Importance of Full Disclosure in the Security Clearance Process