Summary
A 43-year-old dual citizen of South Korea and the United States was denied a security clearance under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) and Guideline C (Foreign Preference). The denial stemmed from inconsistent statements made by the applicant regarding her dual citizenship and foreign financial interests, which raised significant doubts about her security-worthiness.
Specifically, the applicant maintained regular contact with her mother, sister, and three brothers, all of whom are South Korean citizens residing in South Korea. She also sent her mother $100 to $200 every two to three months. A key issue was her unwillingness to renounce her South Korean citizenship, for which she provided inconsistent reasons. In a sworn statement from January 2001, she explicitly stated her intent to maintain dual citizenship to protect her financial interests, including a bank account and property in South Korea.
Further inconsistencies arose regarding her property ownership in South Korea; she initially stated she owned a house but later denied it. Despite having the opportunity, she failed to provide credible evidence that she had disposed of these foreign financial interests as she claimed. The judge concluded that these inconsistencies, combined with her immediate family residing in South Korea, presented unacceptable security risks, leading to the denial of her clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant's inconsistent statements regarding her dual citizenship and foreign financial interests raised security concerns.
- She failed to provide credible evidence of her intent to dispose of her foreign financial interests as stated.
- The presence of immediate family members in South Korea further compounded the security risks.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.A2.1.2.1raisedImmediate Family Member Is a Citizen or Resident of a Foreign Country.
- E2.A2.1.2.8raisedSubstantial Financial Interest in a Foreign Country.
- E2.A3.1.2.1raisedExercise of Dual Citizenship.
- E2.A3.1.2.6raisedUsing Foreign Citizenship to Protect Financial Interests.
Key Rule Quoted
“Once the Government presents evidence that raises reasonable doubts about an applicant's security-worthiness, the burden shifts to applicant to present evidence to overcome these doubts.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedNov 26, 2001
- Answer filedDec 19, 2001Applicant elected to proceed without a hearing.
- Hearing held—Written record only.
- Decision dateJul 25, 2002
Cite For
- Inconsistent Statements Regarding Dual Citizenship Under Guideline C
- Foreign Financial Interests Raising Security Concerns Under Guideline B
- Burden of Proof Shifting to Applicant After Government Raises Doubts About Security-worthiness