Summary
A field engineer, born in 1976, was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline H (Drug Involvement). The applicant admitted to a history of drug use, including daily marijuana use from 1996 to 1998, during which he spent up to $75 monthly on the drug. He also used LSD on Saturdays for three to four months starting in 1997, purchasing papers for $5 each, and used PCP on three occasions in 1997, purchasing it at least once.
Crucially, the applicant deliberately failed to disclose his use of LSD and PCP on Question 27 of his SF-86 security clearance application. While he had not used drugs for over five years, the judge found this falsification to be a significant issue, demonstrating a lack of candor and trustworthiness.
The denial was based on the applicant's admitted drug use and, more critically, his dishonesty in omitting this information from his application. These actions were not considered isolated incidents, ultimately undermining his credibility and suitability for a security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant admitted to using marijuana, LSD, and PCP, which raised security concerns under Guideline H.
- The applicant falsified his security clearance application by omitting his use of LSD and PCP, indicating a lack of candor and trustworthiness under Guideline E.
- The applicant's past drug use and dishonesty were not considered isolated incidents, undermining his credibility and suitability for a security clearance.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.A8.1.2.1raisedDrug Involvement
- E2.A8.1.2.2raisedDrug Involvement
- E2.A5.1.2.2raisedPersonal Conduct
- E2.A5.1.2.4raisedPersonal Conduct
- E2.A5.1.2.5raisedPersonal Conduct
- E2.A8.1.3.1appliedDrug InvolvementThe applicant's drug involvement ended in 1998 and was not recent.
- E2.A8.1.3.2appliedDrug InvolvementThe applicant's drug use was confined to a brief period in his life.
- E2.A8.1.3.3appliedDrug InvolvementThe applicant has not used drugs in 5½ years and has no intention of using drugs again.
- E2.A5.1.3.2rejectedPersonal ConductThe falsifications on the applicant's SF-86 were not isolated incidents and were recent.
Key Rule Quoted
“[N]o one has a 'right' to a security clearance.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedMar 11, 2003
- Answer filedApr 10, 2003
- Hearing heldJul 29, 2003
- Decision dateDec 22, 2003
Cite For
- Disqualifying Conduct Under Guideline H Due to Drug Involvement
- Falsification of Security Clearance Application Under Guideline E
- Credibility Issues Arising From Past Drug Use and Dishonesty.