Summary
A 27-year-old defense contractor was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct), Guideline G (Alcohol Consumption), and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The denial stemmed from the applicant's intentional falsification of material facts on his Security Clearance Application (SCA) dated May 8, 2002, and a documented history of alcohol-related offenses and conduct.
Specifically, the applicant falsely answered "no" to a question about prior alcohol or drug-related charges, despite having a 1995 drug-related charge and DUIs in 1999 and 2000. He also failed to disclose one of two Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) disciplinary proceedings and falsely stated he had not received alcohol counseling, which he had in 1997 or 1998. His history included UCMJ violations in 1997 for provoking words, assault, and drunk and disorderly conduct, and another UCMJ violation in 1997 for drunk and disorderly conduct.
Further criminal conduct included a 1995 plea of guilty to misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia, a 2000 DUI conviction reduced to reckless driving, and a 1999 DUI arrest where charges were dismissed. The judge concluded that the applicant's conduct, marked by dishonesty and a pattern of alcohol-related incidents, reflected adversely on his judgment and reliability, making a security clearance inconsistent with national interest.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- Applicant intentionally falsified material facts on his SCA, including omissions of alcohol-related arrests and counseling.
- The applicant's history of alcohol-related incidents and criminal conduct demonstrated poor judgment and reliability.
- The applicant failed to provide credible evidence to mitigate concerns regarding his alcohol consumption and dishonesty.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.A5.1.2.2appliedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant and Material Facts From Any Personnel Security Questionnaire
- E2.A7.1.2.1appliedAlcohol-related Incidents Away From Work, Such as Driving Under the Influence, Fighting, Child or Spouse Abuse, or Other Criminal Incidents Related to Alcohol Use
- E2.A10.1.2.2appliedA Single Serious Crime or Multiple Lesser Offenses
Key Rule Quoted
“When such an individual intentionally falsifies material facts on a security clearance application, it is extremely difficult to conclude that he or she nevertheless possesses the good judgment, reliability and trustworthiness required of clearance holders.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJan 28, 2004
- Answer filedFeb 9, 2004Applicant elected to have case determined on written record.
- Hearing held—No hearing; case determined on written record.
- Decision dateJun 29, 2004
Cite For
- Intentional Falsification of Material Facts on a Security Clearance Application Under Guideline E
- Impact of Alcohol-related Incidents on Security Clearance Eligibility Under Guideline G
- Consideration of Criminal Conduct in Security Clearance Determinations Under Guideline J