A decided public DOHA case, shown for research, not advice or a prediction.
ISCR Case No. 03-16865.h1
DeniedDecided Oct 21, 2005 · Administrative Judge Joan Caton Anthony · Hearing
Case headnote
Summary
The applicant, a 30-year-old financial analyst, faced security clearance denial under Guidelines E (Personal Conduct), F (Financial Considerations), and J (Criminal Conduct) due to a history of financial delinquency and failure to disclose past criminal conduct. The judge found that the applicant's omissions and financial issues raised significant security concerns, leading to the denial of his clearance.
Why the applicant was denied
- The applicant failed to mitigate a history of financial delinquency, including significant unpaid debts.
- He deliberately omitted relevant facts regarding his past criminal conduct from his security clearance application, providing no credible explanation for these omissions.
Conditions referenced
Disqualifying
- E2.A5.1.2.2 Falsification of informationapplied
- E2.A6.1.2.1 Financial irresponsibilityapplied
- E2.A6.1.2.3 Inability to meet financial obligationsapplied
Key rule quoted
“An applicant who is financially overextended is at risk of having to engage in illegal acts to generate funds.”
Procedural posture
- SOR issued
- January 14, 2005
- Answer filed
- February 2, 2005
- Hearing held
- September 12, 2005
- Decision date
- October 21, 2005
Cite for
- Failure to Disclose Past Criminal Conduct Under Guideline E
- Financial Irresponsibility Leading to Security Concerns Under Guideline F
- Impact of Financial Delinquencies on Security Clearance Eligibility Under Guideline J
Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.
From the decision
Facts this decision states, each with the sentence it comes from. Descriptive of the record, not an assessment.
- Applicant Age
- 30
- Delinquent Usd
- 29389
- Payment Plan
- yes
- Bankruptcy
- none
Allegations under Guideline E
Reading the 4 per allegation rows needs a free account.
4 rows in this decision.
It opens the per allegation record on every guideline: the amounts, the findings, and the sentence behind each row.
Allegations under Guideline F
Reading the 8 per allegation rows needs a free account.
8 rows in this decision.
It opens the per allegation record on every guideline: the amounts, the findings, and the sentence behind each row.
Allegations under Guideline J
Reading the 8 per allegation rows needs a free account.
8 rows in this decision.
It opens the per allegation record on every guideline: the amounts, the findings, and the sentence behind each row.
Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case. The verbatim source decision is below.
Full decision
Open original PDFThe complete official text, footnotes and signatures included, is in the original PDF.
Decision text, by section
ÿWPC( l‹ â ÐK äE Ï¡ld{©s ¦ Ë€2¢…ìóký¹|b¥v¾«9ƒØÚ[U½BQ9¥Lr°}þ‰²3¹8eVÖ+3\…ž8¬Yä²U0ÏK1<ùgÄÐ @ /Ìñlì"k+ÕÀ ž®Õ p @ …"Ñß ª«"M•p!BùÏX¸\šxú +‹š°¿ÉkÙDAüAÈÖ© Û-îð)‹“LÕWìÞë 4‘ ó c wüm˜îêÞ æñ¦`]éæÂf,ë. ;Cç"!ÿr Ø (^ù…ð ÊÞ"᜿¬Dÿ© a=Òñ ó¶Þ ·-ÇVjªÀ¢&ÀyÁ"e•Á òA œ† œ+ þ\´ïxàìݰ …˜{n®ŽR… /hÿëZÁu’¥·©O ±î ÕRr"2Ás&ùGs<~Èå'§‚rå²É= Ã{a^eV†/< ^u °+*A·à à ٦°˜h¡ÏNSÚ (^éŽlž ºÒ¯â÷avH Ú‚r,¼ Œ'#,ÁZ_8 ˜Ç OʈÉó9?ZëÑqéõ x"þÐ+ ¤î'† 4Þtµ¢ƒÜÅœÏ6ê¯M>Ào쎒Jf ¬ØSym<1Íä—Ÿ êÜvŲL¸ýô$B \ # Á U#NÉ % 0 F Þc E A b C ê G 0 b1 ^ “ w Ÿ £ · Æ m È U @ß ß ß U * U >I 0 ©‡ 0 DE ‰ N ž i ¨ 0 y 0 DŠ ÿÎ B >Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í Í B ˜IBM Infoprint 1125, ä, , , , , ä0(Ö Ã 9 Z ‹ 6Times New Roman Regular X ( iñ$¡¡Ó ÓÔ USUS., Ô ÔÝ ƒ ̽% ÝÓ ÓÔ USUS., ÔÚ Ú1Ú Ú.Ý ÝÔ_ ÔExec.€Or. €10865,€ò òSafeguarding€Classified€Information€within€Industryó ó€(Feb.€20,€1960),€as€amended€and€modified. ù à Ý ƒ qÿ) ÝÓ ÓÔ USUS., ÔÝ ÝÔ_ ÔÔ € n X X Ôò òà@ ¢ ¢ ì àFOR€OFFICIAL€USE€ONLYˆÐ ° ÐÔ € , £Ñ , n Ôà@ i i ì àWhen€Ô_ ÔunredactedÔ_ Ô€this€document€contains€informationˆÐ N ž Ðà@ ^ ^ ì àEXEMPT€FROM€MANDATORY€DISCLOSURE€under€the€Ô_ ÔFOIAÔ_ ÔˆÐ Ä Ðà@ < < !ì àExemption€6€appliesó ó (: 3qÿ$©©Ý ƒ iñ! ÝÓ ÓÔ USUS., ÔÝ ÝüšÖ4 ê:i ¢Ø +00 3|x ÿU ‹ÿÀÀÀ(Ö Ã 9 Z ‹ (Times New Roman Times ô \ ` ‹ &Times New Roman (Y( 3¡¡$¤ ¤Ý ƒ iñ! ÝÓ ÓÔ USUS., ÔÝ ÝÔ € ô ´ ò X X Ôà àò òÚ Ú0Ú Úó ó Ñ Ñ ( #Ã$ ò òÚ Ú0Ú Úó ó Ñ Ñ _ Ñ ÑÑ T RXì 3Ø' LetterXì 3Ø' Letterhead 3Ø' Letter`lœd X X X X X¬††XzXzXzXzX> 3Ø' LetterT Ñ (: 3̽$¥¥Ý ƒ iñ! ÝÓ ÓÔ USUS., ÔÝ ÝÚ Ú0Ú Ú. ( &Ó$‘‘ò òÚ Ú1Ú Úó ó õÝ ƒ ̽% ÝÓ ÓÔ USUS., ÔÚ Ú2Ú Ú.Ý ÝÔ_ ÔDepartment€of€Defense€Directive€5220.6,€ò òDefense€Industrial€Personnel€Security€Clearance€Review€Programó ó€(Jan.€2,€1992),€as€amended€and€modified.: web3dhrz16 0 €€ €d ÿÿÿd dÝ ƒ iñ! ÝÓ ÓÔ USUS., ÔÝ ÝÔ_ ÔÑ T @RY, 3Ø' LetterheadXà 3Ø' Letter 3Ø' Letterÿ 3Ø' T ÑÑ @ h ° ÑÑ € ÑÑ 8À ´ ò ò dÄdÈ8ÑÑ @ ÑÑ À P¸ ÑÑ À P¸ ÑÑ À 0h ÑÖ À ÿÿ ÖKEYWORD:€Financial;€Personal€Conduct;€Criminal€ConductÐ ÐDIGEST:€While€Applicant€provided€evidence€to€show€that€he€had€paid€several€of€his€outstanding€debts, €he€failed€to€mitigate€a€history€of€financial€delinquency.€Ð ìì ÐHe€deliberately€omitted€relevant€and€material€facts€regarding€his€past€criminal€conduct€from€his€security€clearance€application€and€offered€no€credibleÐ Ø Ø Ðexplanation€for€his€omissions.€ €Clearance€is€denied.Ð Ä Ä ÐÔ_ ÔCASENOÔ_ Ô:€03"16865.h1Ð ° ° ÐDATE:€10/21/2005Ð œ œ Ðà @ àà @` àà @¸ àà @ àà @h àà @À àà @ àà @p àDATE:€ €October€21,€2005Ð ˆ ˆ ÐÔ_ ÔÔ_ Ôß A€ [ ) ° ° x dExÜ 2AßÐ t t ÐIn€Re:Ð d d ÐÌà @ à""""""""""""""""""""Ìà @ àÔ_ ÔSSNÔ_ Ô:€"""""""""""Ð ( ( ÐÌApplicant€for€Security€ClearanceÐ ÐÌß A€ [ ) ° ° x dEx@ 2AßÐ Ø Ø Ð‡Ô_ ÔISCRÔ_ Ô€Case€No.€03"16865Ð ÐÐ ìì ÐÓ @ ° \ X ›X p ÓÌò òÓ ÓDECISION€OF€ADMINISTRATIVE€JUDGEÐ ìì ÐJOAN€Ô_ ÔCATONÔ_ Ô€ANTHONYÐ Ø Ø ÐÌÌò òAPPEARANCESó óÐ œ œ Ðó óÌÔ € & რ% X X Ôò òFOR€GOVERNMENTó óÐ t t ÐJulie€Edmunds,€Esq.,€Department€CounselÐ L L ÐFrancisco€Mendez,€Esq.,€Department€CounselÐ $ $ ÐÌò òFOR€APPLICANTó óÐ Ô Ô Ðò òò òPro€Seó óó óÔ € X ëäX % & რÔÐ ¬ ¬ ÐÌÌÑ C 0h ÑÑ C Ñò òò òSYNOPSISÐ Z Z ÐÓ ÓÌó óó óÓ Óà @ àWhile€Applicant€provided€evidence€to€show€that€he€had€paid€several€of€his€outstanding€debts,€he€failed€to€mitigate€a€history€of€financial€delinquency.€€HeÐ 2 2 Ðdeliberately€omitted€relevant€and€material€facts€regarding€his€past€criminal€conduct€from€his€security€clearance€application€and€offered€no€credible€explanationÐ Ðfor€his€omissions.€€Clearance€is€denied.Ð ÐÌÌÌÌò òò òÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ôà@ U U ,~ àSTATEMENT€OF€THE€CASEó óó óˆÐ ¦ ¦ ÐÌà @ àThe€Defense€Office€of€Hearings€and€Appeals€(DOHA)€declined€to€grant€or€continue€a€security€clearance€for€Applicant.€ €On€January€14,€2005,€under€theÐ ~ ~ Ðapplicable€Executive€Order× ƒ Ý ×Ý ƒ &Ó Ýò òÚ Ú1Ú Úó óÝ Ý× Ý ×€and€Department€of€Defense€Directive,× ƒ Ý ×Ý ƒ &Ó Ýò òÚ Ú2Ú Úó óÝ Ý× Ý ×€DOHA€issued€a€Statement€of€Reasons€(SOR),€detailing€the€basis€for€its€decisionð! ðsecurityÐ j j Ðconcerns€raised€under€Guideline€F€(Financial€Considerations),€Guideline€E€(Personal€Conduct),€and€Guideline€J€(Criminal€Conduct) €of€the€Directive.€€ApplicantÐ V V Ðanswered€the€SOR€in€writing€on€February€2,€2005,€and€elected€to€have€a€hearing€before€an€administrative€judge.€€The€case€was€assigned€to€me€July€7,€2005.€€OnÐ B B ÐSeptember€12,€2005,€I€convened€a€hearing€to€consider€whether€it€is€clearly€consistent€with€the€national€interest€to€grant€or€continue€a€security€clearance€forÐ . . ÐApplicant.€€The€Government€submitted€four€documents€for€identification€and€admission€to€the€record.€ €The€Governmentð ðs€documents€were€identified€asÐ ÐExhibits€(Ex.)€1€through€4€and€admitted€into€evidence€without€objection.€€Applicant€submitted€five€documents€for€identification€and€admission€to€the€record.€Ð ÐHis€documents€were€identified€as€Exhibits€(Ex.)€A€through€E€and€were€admitted€into€evidence€without€objection.€€On€September€21,€2005,€DOHA€received€theÐ ò ò ! Ðtranscript€(Tr.)€of€the€proceeding.Ð Þ Þ " ÐÌÌò òò òà@ w w ,~ àRULINGS€ON€PROCEDUREó óó óˆÐ ¢!¢!% ÐÌà @ àApplicant€was€not€notified€at€least€15€days€in€advance€of€the€time€and€place€of€his€hearing,€as€required€by€ð ð€E€3.1.8.€of€Enclosure€3€of€DoD€Directive€5220.6.€Ð z#z#' ÐHe€was€offered€an€opportunity€to€reschedule€his€hearing€so€that€he€would€have€a€minimum€of€15€days€to€prepare€in€advance€for€his€hearing.€€Upon€dueÐ f$f$( Ðconsideration, €Applicant€elected€to€waive€the€15€day€notice€provision€of€the€Directive€and€to€proceed€with€his€hearing.€€He€acknowledged€that€he€understoodÐ R%R%) Ðthat€if€he€was€not€the€prevailing€party€and€was€not€granted€a€clearance, €he€would€not€be€able€to€claim€on€appeal€that€he€had€received€insufficient€notice€ofÐ >&>&* Ðhearing€under€the€regulation.Ð *'*'+ ÐÌÌÓ Óò òò òFINDINGS€OF€FACTó óó óÐ î)î). ÐÓ ÓÌà @ àThe€SOR€contains€eight€allegations€of€disqualifying€conduct€under€Guideline€F,€Financial€Considerations,€one€allegation€of€disqualifying€conduct€underÐ Æ+Æ+0 ÐGuideline€E,€Personal€Conduct, €and€two€allegations€of€disqualifying€conduct€under€Guideline€J,€Criminal€Conduct.€€In€his€answer€to€the€SOR,€ApplicantÐ ²,²,1 Ðadmitted€six€allegations.€He€admitted€a€seventh€allegation€but€stated€it€repeated€a€Ñ C P¸ ÑÑ C Ñdebt€he€had€previously€admitted.€ €He€denied€four€allegations.€€His€admissionsÐ ž-ž-2 Ðare€incorporated€as€findings€of€fact.Ð Š.Š.3 ÐÌà @ àApplicant€is€ò òó ó30€years€old.€€He€graduated€from€college€in€May€1997€with€a€bachelor€of€science€degree€in€accounting.€ €Since€April€1998€he€has€been€employed€asÐ b0b05 Ða€financial€analyst€by€a€federal€contractor.€€(Ex.€1.)€€Applicant€needs€a€security€clearance€to€do€his€present€job.€(Tr.€39.)Ð N1N16 ÐÐ :2:27 Ðà @ àApplicant€has€never€been€married.€ €He€has€a€15"year"old€son€and€a€six"year"old€son€from€previous€relationships.€€He€has€had€custody€of€the€older€son€for€periodsÐ Ðof€time€in€the€past.€€He€now€lives€with€a€fiancee€who€is€pregnant€with€his€child.€€(Tr.€65"66.)Ð ìì ÐÌà @ àApplicantð ðs€job€pays€him€approximately€$72,000€annually.€€His€fiancee€earns€between€$70,000€and€$80,000€annually.€€(Tr.€47.)€€Applicant€pays€a€total€ofÐ Ä Ä Ðapproximately€$700€each€month€in€child€support€to€the€mothers€of€his€two€sons€€ (Tr.€46"47.).Ð ° ° ÐÌà @ àApplicant€was€arrested€on€October€8,€1996€and€charged€with€(1)€Credit€Card€Theft,€(2)€Financial€Card€Fraud,€and€(3)€Possession€of€Stolen€Goods.€€He€pledÐ ˆ ˆ Ðguilty€to€the€count€of€Possession€of€Stolen€Goods€and€was€sentenced€to€45€days€confinement.€He€was€placed€on€36€months€probation€and€ordered€to€payÐ t t Ðapproximately€$295€in€court€costs€and€restitution.€€Counts€(1)€and€(2)€were€dismissed€€(Ex.€4.)€ €Ð ` ` ÐÌÒ e ° Òà @½ àAs€of€May€16,€2005,€Applicant€owed€approximately€$29,389€in€delinquent€federal€education€loans€which€had€been€placed€for€collection€in€July€2003€€(€Ex.€E;Ð 8 8 ÐTr.€44.).€ €In€May€2005,€he€entered€an€agreement€to€pay€$575.55€per€month€for€six€months€to€reduce€his€federal€education€loan€debt.€€He€also€agreed€to€provideÐ $ $ Ðthe€Department€of€Education€(DOE) €with€current€financial€information€at€the€end€of€the€six€month€period€and€to€pay€adjusted€installment€amounts€based€onÐ ÐDOEð ðs€analysis€of€his€financial€situation.€€(Ex.€E,€at€8.)Ð ü ü ÐÔ #† X ëäX X X ëäD #ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä ÔÌà @½ àApplicant€has€a€history€of€financial€delinquencies€dating€to€November€1998.€€He€owed€a€debt€to€a€creditor€for€approximately€$2,846,€which€was€charged€off€as€aÐ Ô Ô Ðbad€debt€in€November€1998.€€As€of€October€2004,€the€debt€had€not€been€paid,€nor€had€two€unsatisfied€judgments,€one€entered€against€him€in€July€2000€and€theÐ À À Ðother€entered€against€him€in€April€2002.Ð ¬ ¬ ÐÌà @½ àApplicant€also€owed€a€debt€placed€for€collection€in€August€2003€which€had€not€been€paid€as€of€October€2004.€€Applicantð ðs€personal€financial€statement,Ð " " Ðexecuted€in€April€2003,€indicated€he€lacked€sufficient€funds€after€paying€his€monthly€expenses€to€pay€his€delinquent€debts.€€Applicant€has€€not€sought€financialÐ p p Ðcounseling€for€his€financial€difficulties.€€(Tr.€66.)Ð \ \ ÐÌà @½ àAt€his€hearing,€Applicant€presented€evidence€purporting€to€show€he€had€presented€a€payment€check€of€$493.72€to€a€utility€company€in€full€payment€of€a€debt€heÐ 4 4 Ðhad€denied€he€owed€in€his€answer€to€the€SOR.€€(Ex.€B.)€ €He€showed€he€had€made€partial€payments€on€a€debt€to€a€creditor€€(Ex.€D.),€and€he€provided€evidenceÐ Ðthat€he€had€satisfied€one€of€the€judgments€entered€against€him.€€(Ex.€C.)€€He€stated€that€a€debt€of€$2,846.00€to€Creditor€A,€alleged€in€ð ð€1.b. €of€the€SOR,€was€theÐ Ðsame€debt,€alleged€in€ð ð€1.c.,€for€which€a€judgment€of€$3,630€had€been€entered€against€him€by€Creditor€B€in€July€2000.€€Applicant€failed€to€provide€credibleÐ ø ø Ðevidence€to€substantiate€his€claim.€€(Tr. €54"55.)€Ð ä ä ÐÌÑ C P¸ ÑÑ C Ñà @½ àApplicant€completed€and€signed€a€security€clearance€application€(SF"86)€on€October€16,€2001.€€Question€26€on€the€SF"86€asks,€in€pertinent€part:€ð ðIn€the€last€7Ð ¼ ¼ Ðyears€have€you€been€arrested€for,€charged€with,€or€convicted€of€any€offense(s)€not€listed€in€[your€responses€to€questions]€21,€22,€23,€24,€or€25?ð ð€€ApplicantÐ ¨ ¨ Ðanswered€ð ðnoð ð€to€Question€26,€and€did€not€list€his€arrest€on€October€8,€1996€for€possession€of€stolen€goods.€€In€a€signed,€sworn€statement,€dated€April€25,€2003,Ð ” ” Ðgiven€to€a€special€agent€of€the€Defense€Security€Service, €Applicant€stated€he€did€not€list€the€offense€because€he€thought€applicants€were€not€required€to€listÐ € € Ðcrimes€that€occurred€more€than€six€or€seven€years€before€the€SF"86€was€completed.€(Ex.€2,€at€4;€ò ò€See€ó óalso€Applicantð ðs€Ex.€A).€ €Applicantð ðs€arrest€occurred€fiveÐ l l ! Ðyears€before€he€completed€and€signed€his€SF"86.€€In€his€answer€to€the€SOR,€Applicant€claimed€he€misunderstood€Question€26€and€thus€did€not€answer€itÐ X X " Ðtruthfully.€Ð D D # ÐÌà @½ àApplicant€signed€and€dated€the€following€certification€after€he€completed€his€SF"86:€Ð " "% ÐÌà @½ àà8 @ àMy€statements€on€this€form,€and€any€attachments€to€it,€are€true,€complete, €and€correct€to€the€best€of€my€knowledge€and€belief€and€are€made€in€good€faith.€€IÐ ô#ô#' Ðunderstand€that€a€knowing€and€willful€false€statement€on€this€form€can€be€punished€by€fine€or€imprisonment€or€both€€(See€section€1001€of€title€18,€United€StatesÐ à$à$( ÐCode.)Ð Ì%Ì%) ÐÌÌÓ Óò òò òPOLICIESó óó óÐ ( (, ÐÓ ÓÌÔ #† X ëäX X X ëäV #ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ôà @½ àð ð[No€one€has€a€ð ðrightð ð€to€a€security€clearance.ð ð€ €ò òDepartment€of€the€Navy€v.€Eganó ó,€484€U.S.€518,€528€(1988).€€As€Commander€in€Chief,€the€President€has€ð ðtheÐ h*h*. Ðauthority€to€.€.€. €control€access€to€information€bearing€on€national€security€and€to€determine€whether€an€individual€is€sufficiently€trustworthy€to€occupy€a€positionÐ T+T+/ Ð.€.€.€that€will€give€that€person€access€to€such€information.ð ð€€ò òId.ó ó€at€527.€ €The€President€has€restricted€eligibility€for€access€to€classified€information€to€UnitedÐ @,@,0 ÐStates€citizens€ð ðwhose€personal€and€professional€history€affirmatively€indicates€loyalty€to€the€United€States,€strength€of€character,€trustworthiness,€honesty,Ð ,-,-1 Ðreliability,€discretion,€and€sound€judgment,€as€well€as€freedom€from€conflicting€allegiances€and€potential€for€coercion,€and€willingness€and€ability€to€abide€byÐ . .2 Ðregulations€governing€the€use,€handling,€and€protection€of€classified€information.ð ð€€Exec.€Or. €12968,€ò òAccess€to€Classified€Informationó ó€ð ð€3.1(b)€(Aug.€4,€1995).€Ð / /3 ÐEligibility€for€a€security€clearance€is€predicated€upon€the€applicant€meeting€the€security€guidelines€contained€in€the€Directive.Ð ð/ð/4 ÐÌà @½ àEnclosure€2€of€the€Directive€sets€forth€personal€security€guidelines,€as€well€as€the€disqualifying€conditions€(DC)€and€mitigating€conditions€(MC)€under€eachÐ È1È16 Ðguideline.€€In€evaluating€the€security€worthiness€of€an€applicant, €the€administrative€judge€must€also€assess€the€adjudicative€process€factors€listed€in€ð ð€6.3€of€theÐ ÐDirective.€€The€decision€to€deny€an€individual€a€security€clearance€is€not€necessarily€a€determination€as€to€the€loyalty€of€the€applicant.€€ò òSeeó ó€Exec.€Or. €10865€ð ð€7.€Ð ìì ÐIt€is€merely€an€indication€that€the€applicant€has€not€met€the€strict€guidelines€the€President€and€the€Secretary€of€Defense€have€established€for€issuing€a€clearance.Ð Ø Ø ÐÌÓ `@I [ X ` ¸ h À p È x Ð (#€ %Ø'0*ˆ,à.81 3è5 ° \ X ›X `Óà @ àInitially,€the€Government€must€establish,€by€substantial€evidence,€conditions€in€the€personal€or€professional€history€of€the€applicant€that€disqualify,€or€mayÐ ° ° Ðdisqualify, €the€applicant€from€being€eligible€for€access€to€classified€information.€€ò òSee€Eganó ó,€484€U.S. €at€531.€Ô #† X ëäX X X ëä .#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ô€Ô #† X ëäX X X ëäÞ7#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä ÔThe€Directive€presumes€a€nexus€or€rationalÐ œ œ Ðconnection€between€proven€conduct€under€any€of€the€disqualifying€conditions€listed€in€the€guidelines€and€an€applicantð ðs€security€suitability.€€ò òSee€ó óÔ_ ÔISCRÔ_ Ô€Case€No.Ð ˆ ˆ Ð95"0611€at€2€(App.€Bd. €May€2,€1996).Ô #† X ëäX X X ëä!8#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ô€€Ô #† X ëäX X X ëä¤9#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä ÔÐ t t ÐÌà @ àOnce€the€Government€establishes€a€disqualifying€condition€by€substantial€evidence, €the€burden€shifts€to€the€applicant€to€rebut,€explain,€extenuate,€or€mitigateÐ L L Ðthe€facts.€€Ô_ ÔISCRÔ_ Ô€Case€No.€01"20700€at€3€(App.€Bd.€Dec.€19,€2002);€ò òsee€ó óDirective€ð ð€E3.1.15.€€An€applicant€ð ðhas€the€ultimate€burden€of€demonstrating€that€it€isÐ 8 8 Ðclearly€consistent€with€the€national€interest€to€grant€or€continue€his€security€clearance.ð ð€€Ô_ ÔISCRÔ_ Ô€Case€No.€01-20700€at€3.Ð $ $ ÐÌÌÓ Óò òò òCONCLUSIONSó óó óÐ è è ÐÓ ÓÌÔ #† X ëäX X X ëäè9#Ôò òÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä ÔGuiÔ #† X ëäX X X ëäÙ<೦#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ôò òó ódeline€Fð! ðFinancial€Considerationsó óÐ À À ÐÌà @ àÔ #† X ëäX X X ëä =#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä ÔThe€Governmentð ðs€concern€under€Guideline€F,€Financial€Considerations,€is€that€individuals€who€are€financially€overextended€and€unable€or€unwilling€to€payÐ ˜ ˜ Ðtheir€just€debts€may€try€to€generate€funds€by€engaging€in€illegal€acts.€€Applicant€has€a€history€of€not€meeting€his€financial€obligations,€and€his€financial€historyÐ " " Ðsuggests€an€inability€or€unwillingness€to€satisfy€his€debts, €conditions€which€raise€security€concerns€under€subparagraphs€E2.A6.1.2.1.€and€E2.A6.1.2.3.€ofÐ p p ÐGuideline€F.Ô #† X ëäX X X ëä¯=#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ô€€DOHAð ðs€Appeal€Board€has€concluded€that€ð ð[a] €person€who€is€unwilling€to€fulfill€his€legal€obligations€does€not€demonstrate€the€high€degree€ofÐ \ \ Ðgood€judgment€and€reliability€required€of€persons€granted€access€to€classified€information.ð ð€€Ô_ ÔISCRÔ_ Ô€Case€No.€98"0810€at€4€€(App.€Bd. €June€8,€2000).Ô #† X ëäX X X ëä @#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä ÔÐ H H ÐÌÔ #† X ëäX X X ëä¶A#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ôà @ àIn€the€SOR,€DOHA€alleged€in€ð ð€1.a. €that€Applicant€was€arrested€and€charged€with€(1)€Financial€Card€Theft,€(2)€Financial€Card€Fraud,€and€(3)€Possession€ofÐ ÐStolen€Goods,€that€he€pled€guilty€to€the€Possession€of€Stolen€Goods€charge,€was€sentenced€to€45€days€confinement, €placed€on€36€months€probation€and€orderedÐ Ðto€pay€court€costs€and€restitution€of€approximately€$295.€€DOHA€also€alleged€in€the€SOR€that€Applicant€owed€a€creditor€approximately€$2,846€on€an€accountÐ ø ø Ðcharged€off€as€a€bad€debt€in€November€1998€and€the€debt€had€not€been€satisfied€as€of€October€2004€(ð ð€1.b);€that€Applicant€owed€two€creditors€approximatelyÐ ä ä Ð$27,000€on€three€accounts€placed€for€collection€in€July€and€August, €2003€and€the€accounts€had€not€been€paid€as€of€October€2004€(ð ðð ð€1.e,€1.f.,€and€1.Ô_ Ôg.);€thatÔ_ ÔÐ Ð Ð ÐApplicant€had€two€judgments€entered€against€him€by€creditors€in€July€2000€and€April€2002€on€accounts€totaling€approximately€ $9,300€and€the€judgments€hadÐ ¼ ¼ Ðnot€been€satisfied€as€of€October€2004€(ð ðð ð€1.c€and€1.Ô_ Ôd.);€andÔ_ Ô€that€Applicantð ðs€personal€financial€statement,€dated€April€25,€2003,€indicted€he€lacked€sufficientÐ ¨ ¨ Ðresources€to€satisfy€his€delinquent€accounts€(ð ð€1.Ô_ Ôh.)Ô_ Ô€€An€applicant€who€is€financially€overextended€is€at€risk€of€having€to€engage€in€illegal€acts€to€generate€funds.€Ð ” ” ÐDirective€ð ð€E2.A6.1.1.Ð € € ÐÔ #† X ëäX X X ëä B#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä ÔÌÔ #† X ëäX X X ëä‹H#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ôà @ àThe€record€shows€Applicant€took€action€after€receiving€the€SOR€and€attempted€to€resolve€some€of€his€financial€delinquencies. €€Working€with€oneð ðs€creditors€toÐ X X " Ðpay€and€settle€long"standing€debts€is€commendable.€€However,€Applicantð ðs€last"minute€actions€are€not€a€substitute€ð ðfor€evidence€of€a€demonstrated€track€recordÐ D D # Ðof€financial€reform, €a€track€record€that€is€necessary€to€satisfy€Applicantð ðs€burden€of€persuasion€that€it€is€clearly€consistent€with€the€national€interest€to€grant€orÐ 0!0!$ Ðcontinue€access€to€classified€information.ð ð€€Ô_ ÔISCRÔ_ Ô€Case€No.€98"0445€at€3€(App.€Bd. €April€2,€1999.)€€Ð " "% Ðà @ àWhile€Applicant€initially€denied€owing€the€creditor€of€the€debt€identified€at€1.g.€of€the€SOR,€€he€presented€evidence€that€he€had€paid€it.€€I€conclude€thatÐ # #& ÐApplicantð ðs€denial€of€the€debt€was€not€credible. €€While€Applicant€stated€that€a€debt€of€$2,846.00€to€Creditor€A,€alleged€in€ð ð€1.b.€of€the€SOR,€was€the€same€debtÐ ô#ô#' Ðalleged€in€ð ð€1.c.,€for€which€a€judgment€of€$3,630€had€been€entered€against€him€by€Creditor€B, €he€did€not€provide€credible€evidence€supporting€his€claim.Ð à$à$( ÐÌÔ #† X ëäX X X ëäÎH#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ôà @ àThe€Government€has€established,€through€Applicantð ðs€admissions€and€the€record€evidence, €a€ò òprima€facieó ó€case€that€Applicant€is€financially€overextended.€Ð ¸&¸&* ÐApplicant€provided€no€persuasive€evidence€to€rebut€the€financial€concerns€specified€in€the€SOR€and€identified€as€disqualifying€conditions€under€ð ðð ð€E2.A6.1.2.1.Ð ¤'¤'+ Ðand€E2.A6.1.2.3.€of€Guideline€F.Ð ( (, ÐÌà @ àWe€turn€to€a€review€of€the€several€conditions€that€could€mitigate€the€security€concerns€raised€by€Applicantð ðs€financial€delinquencies.€€Applicantð ðs€acknowledgedÐ h*h*. Ðdelinquencies€date€to€at€least€1998.€€His€financial€delinquencies€involve€long"standing€debts,€and€his€inability€or€unwillingness€to€pay€them€is€recent.€€Thus,Ð T+T+/ Ðneither€mitigating€condition€E2.A.6.1.3.1.€nor€mitigating€condition€E2.A6.1.3.2.€applies.Ð @,@,0 ÐÌà @ àThe€record€shows€Applicant€has€been€Ô #† X ëäX X X ëä N#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ôsingle€and€steadily€employed€since€1998.€€He€has€not€sought€financial€counseling€and€has€not€presented€clear€indicationsÐ . .2 Ðthat€his€financial€problems€are€being€resolved€or€are€more€than€temporarily€under€control.€€He€has€not€demonstrated€that€his€financial€delinquencies€were€largelyÐ / /3 Ðbeyond€his€control.€€Therefore,€mitigating€conditions€E2.A6.1.3.3.€and€E2.A6.1.3.4.€are€inapplicable, €and€the€Guideline€F€allegations€in€the€SOR€are€concludedÐ ð/ð/4 Ðagainst€the€Applicant.Ð Ü0Ü05 ÐÐ È1È16 Їò òGuideline€E€"€Personal€ConductÐ Ðó óÔ #† X ëäX X X ëä R#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä ÔÌà @ àIn€the€SOR,€DOHA€alleged€Applicant€raised€concerns€under€Guideline€E,€Personal€Conduct,€when€he€failed€to€list€his€October€8,€1996€arrest€in€his€answer€toÐ Ø Ø ÐQuestion€26€on€his€SF"86€(ð ð€2.Ô_ Ôa.)Ô_ Ô€€€Guideline€E€conduct,€which€involves€questionable€judgment,€untrustworthiness,€unreliability,€lack€of€candor,€dishonesty,€orÐ Ä Ä Ðunwillingness€to€comply€with€rules€and€regulations, €could€indicate€an€applicant€may€not€properly€safeguard€classified€information.€€Directive€ð ð€E2.A5.1.1.Ð ° ° ÐÌà @ àWith€respect€to€the€Guideline€E€conduct€alleged€in€the€SOR,€the€Government€has€established€its€case.€€The€Government€established, €and€Applicant€failed€toÐ ˆ ˆ Ðpersuasively€rebut,€the€allegation€he€had€omitted,€concealed€and€falsified€relevant€and€material€facts€from€his€personnel€security€questionnaire.€€ð ð€E2.A5.1.2.2.€Ð t t ÐHis€concealment€of€information€he€considered€embarrassing€or€professionally€damaging€could€make€him€vulnerable€to€coercion€and€blackmail.€€ð ðE2.A5.1.2.4.€Ð ` ` ÐHis€conduct€raises€additional€concerns€under€E2.A5.1.2.5.€because€it€suggests€a€pattern€of€dishonesty€or€rule€violation.€€Applicantð ðs€reticence€to€reveal€the€truthÐ L L Ðabout€his€conduct€suggests€that,€under€some€circumstances, €he€may€put€his€interests€before€those€of€the€Government.€€Ð 8 8 ÐÌà @ àMitigating€condition€E2.A5.1.3.1€does€not€apply€to€the€facts€of€this€case.€€The€information€Applicant€withheld€is€pertinent€to€a€determination€of€his€judgment,Ð Ðtrustworthiness,€and€reliability.€€Only€one€other€mitigating€condition€under€Guideline€E€might€be€applicable€to€the€instant€case.€€The€security€concern€raised€byÐ ü ü ÐApplicantð ðs€disqualifying€conduct€could€be€mitigated€if€the€falsification€was€an€isolated€incident,€was€not€recent,€and€if€the€Applicant€subsequently€provided€theÐ è è Ðcorrect€information€voluntarily.€€ð ðE.2.A.5.1.3.2.€ €Applicant€acknowledged€the€correct€information€when€confronted€by€an€investigator€of€the€Defense€SecurityÐ Ô Ô ÐService€in€November€2003.€€However,€in€his€signed,€sworn€statement€and€in€his€Ex.€A, €Applicant€attempted€to€minimize€his€falsification€by€stating€he€thought€itÐ À À Ðhad€occurred€more€than€six€or€seven€years€before€he€completed€his€SF"86,€when,€in€fact,€it€had€occurred€five€years€before€he€completed€his€SF"86.€Ð ¬ ¬ ÐAdditionally, €he€claimed€he€did€not€understand€the€question.€€Applicant€is€college"educated€and€earns€his€living€as€a€financial€analyst,€a€profession€requiringÐ ˜ ˜ Ðresponsibility€as€a€fiduciary€and€the€accurate€use€of€numbers€and€language.€ €While€his€falsification€of€his€SF"86€occurred€in€2001,€Applicantð ðs€subsequentÐ " " Ðexplanations€for€failing€to€answer€Question€26€accurately€and€fully€suggest€on"going€lack€of€candor.€€His€disqualifying€personal€conduct€is€recent€and€notÐ p p Ðisolated.€€Accordingly,€the€allegation€in€subparagraph€2.a.€of€the€SOR€is€concluded€against€the€Applicant.Ð \ \ ÐÌò òGuideline€J€"€Criminal€Conductó óÐ 4 4 ÐÔ #† X ëäX X X ëäÊT#Ôò òò òÓ Óó óÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ôó óÌÓ Óà @ àIn€the€SOR, €DOHA€alleged€Applicant€knowingly€and€willfully€falsified€his€answer€to€Question€26€on€his€security€clearance€application€in€violation€of€18€U.S.C.Ð Ðð ð€1001€and€that€this€act€constituted€felonious€criminal€conduct.€€(ð ðð ð€3.a. €and€3.Ô_ Ôb.)Ô_ Ô€€It€is€a€criminal€offense€to€knowingly€and€willfully€make€any€materially€false,Ð ø ø Ðfictitious€or€fraudulent€statement€or€representation€in€any€matter€within€the€jurisdiction€of€the€executive€branch€of€the€Government€of€the€United€States.€€18Ð ä ä ÐU.S.C.€ð ð€1001.€€Security€clearances€are€within€the€jurisdiction€of€the€executive€branch.€ €ò òSeeó ó€ò òEganó ó,€484€U.S.€at€527.Ð Ð Ð ÐÌà @ àA€person€seeking€access€to€classified€information€enters€into€a€fiduciary€relationship€with€the€Government€based€upon€trust€and€confidence.€€Where€the€factsÐ ¨ ¨ Ðproven€by€the€Government€or€admitted€by€the€applicant€raise€doubts€about€the€applicantð ðs€judgment,€reliability€or€trustworthiness,€the€applicant€has€a€heavyÐ ” ” Ðburden€of€persuasion€to€demonstrate€that€he€or€she€is€nevertheless€security€worthy.€€Ð € € ÐÔ #† X ëäX X X ëäßa#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä ÔÌà @ àA€history€or€pattern€of€criminal€activity€raises€doubts€about€a€personð ðs€judgment,€reliability,€and€trustworthiness.€(ð ð€E2.A10.1.1)€€Disqualifying€conditionsÐ X X " Ðinclude€allegations€or€admissions€of€criminal€conduct,€regardless€of€whether€the€person€was€formally€charged€€(ð ð€E2.A10.1.2.1.),€and€a€single€serious€crime€orÐ D D # Ðmultiple€lesser€offenses€€(ð ð€E2.A10.1.2.2.).€ €Applicantð ðs€conduct€raises€security€concerns€underð ð€E2.A10.1.2.1.€and€ð ð€E2.A10.1.2.2.€of€Guideline€J.Ð 0!0!$ ÐÌà @ àÔ #† X ëäX X X ëäùf#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä ÔApplicant€denied€the€criminal€conduct€alleged€by€the€Government€in€ð ðð ð€3.a.€and€3.b.€of€the€SOR,€but€offered€no€credible€explanations€in€support€of€his€denials. # #& ÐApplicant€failed€to€report€his€1996€arrest€and€charges€of€financial€card€theft,€financial€card€fraud,€and€possession€of€stolen€goods,€criminal€conduct€that€occurredÐ ô#ô#' €Ô #† X ëäX X X ëäwi#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä ÔÐ Ðfive€years€before€he€completed€his€SF"86€in€2001.€€As€a€result€of€his€guilty€plea€to€possession€of€stolen€goods€in€1996,€Applicant€was€sentenced€to€45€daysÐ à$à$( Ðconfinement€and€36€months€of€probation.€ €While€the€conduct€that€gave€rise€to€his€arrest€occurred€in€1996€and€was€not€recent,€his€falsification€took€place€in€2001Ð Ì%Ì%) Ðand€was€recent.€€Together,€the€two€acts€are€not€isolated€and€demonstrate€a€pattern€of€criminal€conduct.€€Thus, €mitigating€conditions€ð ðð ð€E2.A10.1.3.1.€andÐ ¸&¸&* ÐE2.A10.1.3.2€of€Guideline€J€do€not€apply€in€this€case.Ð ¤'¤'+ ÐÌÔ #† X ëäX X X ëä_j#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ôà @ àI€conclude€Applicant€deliberately€falsified€his€security€clearance€application€by€omitting€relevant€and€material€information€and€then€certifying€his€statements€onÐ |)|)- Ðhis€SF"86€as€true, €complete,€and€correct€to€the€best€of€his€knowledge€and€belief€and€made€in€good€faith.€€After€weighing€the€disqualifying€and€mitigatingÐ h*h*. Ðconditions€of€Guideline€J€and€after€evaluating€Applicantð ðs€conduct€in€light€of€the€whole€person€concept€identified€at€ð ð€E2.2€of€Enclosure€2€of€the€Directive,€IÐ T+T+/ Ðconclude€the€Guideline€J€allegations€of€the€SOR€against€the€Applicant.€€Ð @,@,0 ÐÌÌà@ à à /~ àÔ #† X ëäX X X ëäÕm#Ôò òò òÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ôò òò òó óó óFORMAL€FINDINGSˆÐ / /3 ÐÌó óó óÔ #† X ëäX X X ëä¹p#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ôà @ àThe€following€are€my€conclusions€as€to€each€allegation€in€the€SOR:Ð Ü0Ü05 ÐÐ È1È16 Ðà @ àParagraph€1.:€Guideline€F:€AGAINST€APPLICANTÐ ÐÌà @ àà @` àSubparagraph€1.a.:€Against€ApplicantÐ Ø Ø Ðà @ àà @` àSubparagraph€1.b.:€Against€ApplicantÐ Ä Ä Ðà @ àà @` àSubparagraph€1.c.:€Against€ApplicantÐ ° ° Ðà @ àà @` àSubparagraph€1.d.:€Against€ApplicantÐ œ œ Ðà @ àà @` àSubparagraph€1.e.:€Against€ApplicantÐ ˆ ˆ Ðà @ àà @` àSubparagraph€1.f.:€Against€ApplicantÐ t t Ðà @ àà @` àSubparagraph€1.g.: €Against€ApplicantÐ ` ` Ðà @ àà @` àSubparagraph€1.h.:€Against€ApplicantÐ L L ÐÌà @ àParagraph€2.:€Guideline€E:€AGAINST€APPLICANTÐ $ $ ÐÌà @ àà @` àSubparagraph€2.a.:€Against€ApplicantÐ ü ü Ðà @ àà @` àÌà @ àà @` àÔ #† X ëäX X X ëä3q#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä ÔÌà @ àParagraph€3.:€Guideline€J:€AGAINST€APPLICANTÐ À À ÐÌà @ àà @` àSubparagraph€3.a.: €Against€ApplicantÐ ˜ ˜ Ðà @ àà @` àSubparagraph€3.b.:€Against€Applicant€Ð " " ÐÌà @ àà @` àÌÔ #† X ëäX X X ëä”u#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä Ôò òò òÓ ÓDECISIONó óó óÐ H H ÐÓ w ÓÌà @ àIn€light€of€all€of€the€circumstances€presented€by€the€record€in€this€case,€it€is€not€clearly€consistent€with€the€national€interest€to€grant€or€continue€a€securityÐ Ðclearance€for€Applicant.€€Clearance€is€denied.Ð ÐÌÌÓ Óò òó óÌJoan€Ô_ ÔCatonÔ_ Ô€AnthonyÐ ¼ ¼ ÐAdministrative€JudgeÐ ¨ ¨ ÐÔ #† X ëäX X X ëäâv#ÔÔ ‡ X ëäX X X ëä ÔÌò òò òÔ #† X ëäX X X ëäõx#Ôó óó ó
FOOTNOTES