Summary
A 48-year-old engineer was granted a security clearance despite a history of drug involvement, primarily under Guideline H. Allegations included marijuana use from 1975 to 1989 and again from April to December 2002, with daily use at times. He tested positive for marijuana in December 2002, leading to a one-week suspension, referral to an Employee Assistance Program (EAP), and subsequent outpatient substance abuse counseling for cannabis dependence from February to April 2003.
His marijuana use continued after receiving a DoD security clearance in June 2000 and after being granted access to Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) by another government agency. His SCI access was revoked in February 2003 following the positive drug test, and he had previously signed an acknowledgment in August 2001 regarding the consequences of unlawful drug use. Additionally, he received two citations for marijuana possession in the late 1970s and early 1980s, and used cocaine approximately six times during college between 1976 and 1981.
The clearance was granted because the applicant demonstrated substantial rehabilitation. This included engaging in outpatient counseling, attending a 12-step program, and receiving positive evaluations from both mental health professionals and his employer regarding his integrity and work ethic. The judge noted that his last drug use occurred over three years prior to the hearing, indicating a significant period of abstinence and a current possession of the judgment and reliability required for a security clearance.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant demonstrated substantial rehabilitation through outpatient counseling and participation in a 12-step program.
- He received positive evaluations from mental health professionals and his employer regarding his integrity and work ethic.
- The last drug use occurred over three years prior to the hearing, indicating a significant passage of time without recurrence.
Conditions Referenced
- DC 1raisedAny Drug Abuse
- DC 2raisedIllegal Drug Possession
- MC 1appliedThe Drug Involvement Was Not Recent
- MC 3appliedDemonstrated Intent Not to Abuse Drugs in the Future
- MC 4appliedSatisfactorily Completed a Prescribed Drug Treatment Program
Key Rule Quoted
“The ultimate issue is not one of punishment but of the likelihood of unacceptable future conduct.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedSep 9, 2005
- Answer filedOct 4, 2005
- Hearing heldMar 6, 2006
- Decision dateApr 20, 2006
Cite For
- Substantial Rehabilitation Under Guideline H
- Impact of Time Elapsed Since Last Drug Use on Security Clearance Eligibility
- Importance of Positive Evaluations From Mental Health Professionals in Mitigation Cases