Summary
A 47-year-old journeyman electrician was denied a security clearance due to significant financial considerations and a lengthy criminal record. Despite steady employment since 2002, the applicant had unresolved delinquent accounts and a history of offenses, including domestic violence. The judge concluded that granting a clearance was not consistent with national interest.
The applicant's financial issues included a 1993 Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing for $13,394 in debt. He also had at least three delinquent collection accounts totaling $1,819, two additional collection accounts totaling $804 that he claimed to have paid or disputed, and a $5,875 judgment from charged-off accounts. Furthermore, an automobile repossession resulted in a $20,655 deficit, and a defaulted student loan of $418 was also noted.
His criminal history spanned from 1977 to at least December 2001, including convictions for felony theft, attempt burglary, retail theft, marijuana possession, and attempt conversion. In 1989, he was arrested for numerous controlled substance offenses, pleading guilty to possession of a narcotic drug. He was also charged with domestic battery in December 2001 and again in June 2002. The denial was based on his financial irresponsibility, serious criminal conduct, and failure to mitigate these issues.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant has a significant history of unpaid debts totaling over $28,000, indicating financial irresponsibility.
- The applicant has a lengthy criminal history, including serious offenses and domestic violence incidents, raising concerns about judgment and reliability.
- The applicant failed to provide evidence of efforts to resolve his financial issues or mitigate the impact of his criminal history.
Conditions Referenced
- DC 1appliedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- DC 3appliedInability or Unwillingness to Satisfy Debts
- DC 1appliedAllegations or Admission of Criminal Conduct, Regardless of Whether the Person Was Formally Charged
- DC 2appliedA Single Serious Crime or Multiple Lesser Offenses
Key Rule Quoted
“No one has a right to a security clearance and the clearly consistent standard indicates that security clearance determinations should err, if they must, on the side of denials.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedDec 28, 2004
- Answer filedJan 14, 2005Requested decision based on written record without a hearing.
- Hearing held—No hearing was held.
- Decision dateNov 23, 2005
Cite For
- Denial Based on Significant Unpaid Debts Under Guideline F
- Denial Due to a Lengthy Criminal History Under Guideline J
- Failure to Demonstrate Mitigation of Financial and Criminal Issues.