Summary
A 52-year-old software engineer was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline G (Alcohol Consumption). The applicant had a documented history of excessive alcohol consumption between approximately 1999 and 2004, including multiple diagnoses of alcohol dependence by medical authorities. He underwent several treatment programs, including one from October 2001 to September 2002, and sought specialized treatment in November 2002 for a dual diagnosis. He was also hospitalized for detoxification.
Despite these interventions, the applicant continued to consume alcohol, at times to excess, after completing the programs. This pattern culminated in his arrest and charge for driving under the influence of alcohol in March 2004. Following this arrest, he voluntarily checked into an alcohol treatment center and made progress in managing his alcohol problems.
However, the judge ultimately found that the applicant failed to mitigate the security concerns related to his alcohol use. The denial was based on his long history of excessive consumption, the DUI arrest in March 2004, and his resumption of excessive drinking after completing prior treatment programs.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant has a long history of excessive alcohol consumption, including multiple diagnoses of alcohol dependence.
- He was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol in March 2004, which is a disqualifying condition.
- Despite completing treatment programs, the applicant resumed excessive drinking after treatment.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.A7.1.2.1appliedAlcohol-related Incidents Away From Work
- E2.A7.1.2.3appliedDiagnosis by a Credentialed Medical Professional of Alcohol Abuse or Alcohol Dependence
- E2.A7.1.2.6appliedConsumption of Alcohol, Subsequent to a Diagnosis of Alcoholism by a Credentialed Medical Professional and Following Completion of an Alcohol Rehabilitation Program
- E2.A7.1.3.1appliedThe Alcohol-related Incidents Do Not Indicate a Pattern
- E2.A7.1.3.2rejectedThe Problem Occurred a Number of Years Ago and There Is No Indication of a Recent Problem
- E2.A7.1.3.3appliedPositive Changes in Behavior Supportive of Sobriety
Key Rule Quoted
“"The adjudicative process is an examination of a sufficient period of a person's life to make an affirmative determination that the person is eligible for a security clearance."”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedMay 31, 2005
- Answer filedJun 29, 2005
- Hearing held—Decided without a hearing.
- Decision dateNov 30, 2005
Cite For
- Disqualifying Conditions Related to Alcohol Consumption Under Guideline G
- Impact of a DUI Arrest on Security Clearance Eligibility
- Mitigating Factors for Alcohol-related Incidents in Security Clearance Cases