Summary
A 53-year-old software quality engineer, born in Iran, sought to renew his security clearance. The Statement of Reasons raised concerns under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) and Guideline C (Foreign Preference). Specifically, the applicant was alleged to have exercised dual citizenship with Iran and the U.S., possessed a valid Iranian passport, and used it for travel to Iran in 2001 and 2002.
Regarding foreign influence, the applicant's parents and eleven younger siblings are resident citizens of Iran, as are his father-in-law, mother-in-law, and brother-in-law. Two of his sisters are school teachers whose salaries are paid by the Iranian government. The applicant also sends approximately $1,000.00 to $1,500.00 yearly to his mother in Iran.
While the applicant mitigated foreign preference concerns by surrendering his Iranian passport and renouncing his citizenship, he was unable to mitigate the foreign influence concerns. The decision noted that his immediate family members residing in Iran, particularly his parents, created potential vulnerabilities to foreign influence. Consequently, despite demonstrating loyalty to the U.S., his security clearance was denied.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant has immediate family members who are resident citizens of Iran, creating potential foreign influence concerns.
- Despite demonstrating loyalty to the U.S., the applicant's ties to his parents in Iran raised security concerns regarding his vulnerability to foreign influence.
Conditions Referenced
- FI DC 1raisedAn Immediate Family Member, or a Person to Whom the Individual Has Close Ties of Affection or Obligation, Is a Citizen Of, or Resident or Present In, a Foreign Country.
- FI DC 3raisedRelatives, Cohabitants, or Associates Who Are Connected with Any Foreign Government.
- FI MC 1appliedA Determination That the Immediate Family Member(s) in Question Are Not Agents of a Foreign Power or in a Position to Be Exploited by a Foreign Power.
- FI MC 3appliedContact and Correspondence with Foreign Citizens Are Casual and Infrequent.
Key Rule Quoted
“"Any doubt as to whether access to classified information is clearly consistent with national security will be resolved in favor of the national security."”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJun 22, 2005
- Answer filedJul 11, 2005
- Hearing heldOct 26, 2005
- Decision dateMay 31, 2006
Cite For
- Foreign Influence Concerns Due to Immediate Family Ties Under Guideline B
- Mitigation of Foreign Preference Through Renunciation of Citizenship Under Guideline C
- The Impact of Familial Obligations on Security Clearance Determinations