Summary
A 57-year-old defense contractor with a long history of security clearance was subject to a DOHA review under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations) due to $11,000 in delinquent debts. The Statement of Reasons detailed four specific debts: $5,908, $2,929, $1,782, and $490.
For the largest debt, the applicant attempted to contact the creditor but received no response, and the credit report showed incorrect addresses. For the $2,929 debt, he sent two registered letters that were returned unaccepted, coinciding with a Federal Trade Commission investigation into the creditor's practices. The $1,782 debt was owed to a furniture company that had ceased operations in his city, making it difficult to locate. The smallest debt, $490, was a credit card balance paid in May 2003, and he now holds a zero-balance card with the same company. All outstanding debts have since been located by a credit counselor and are now on a payment plan.
The judge granted the security clearance, finding that the applicant had made a good-faith effort to resolve his delinquent debts through a credit counseling program. He demonstrated the financial means to pay off the debts, and his explanation for not reporting them was deemed credible and not deliberate.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant demonstrated a good-faith effort to resolve his delinquent debts through a credit counseling program.
- He has the financial means to pay off the debts, as evidenced by his salary and savings.
- The applicant's explanation for the failure to report debts was credible and not deemed deliberate.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.A6.1.2.1raisedHistory of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- E2.A6.1.2.3raisedEvidence of Inability or Unwillingness to Satisfy Debts
- E2.A5.1.1raisedQuestionable Judgment, Unreliability, and Unwillingness to Comply with Rules
- E2.A5.1.2.2raisedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant Facts
- E2.A6.1.3.3rejectedConditions Largely Beyond the Person's ControlThe judge found little evidence that the debts resulted from conditions beyond the applicant's control.
- E2.A6.1.3.4appliedReceiving Counseling for the Problem
- E2.A6.1.3.6appliedGood-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors
Key Rule Quoted
“"[N]o one has a 'right' to a security clearance."”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedNov 9, 2005
- Answer filedDec 1, 2005
- Hearing heldAug 24, 2006Hearing was rescheduled due to applicant's overseas work.
- Decision dateNov 20, 2006
Cite For
- Mitigation of Financial Concerns Under Guideline F Through Credit Counseling
- Credibility of Applicant's Explanation for Financial Omissions Under Guideline E
- Consideration of the Whole Person Concept in Security Clearance Determinations