Summary
A 32-year-old bus driver for a defense contractor was denied a security clearance primarily due to significant financial concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The applicant had nearly $10,000 in unresolved delinquent debts, with two creditors and the IRS garnishing his salary. While he was making payments on a $2,638 debt and a $35,000 student loan, over $10,000 remained unpaid. He also regularly paid on three credit cards but not the full amounts due.
Although the applicant had a learning disability that contributed to his misunderstanding of SF 86 questions, his failure to report delinquent debts on the form raised concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The judge found his criminal conduct related to the non-disclosure mitigated, and noted his reputation for trustworthiness and honesty, and that he was a hard-working individual.
However, the applicant's sporadic attention to debt repayment and limited ability to pay were deemed insufficient to demonstrate financial responsibility. Despite being in a financial consulting plan, the applicant failed to mitigate the nearly $10,000 in delinquent debts, leading to the denial of his security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- Applicant failed to mitigate delinquent debts totaling nearly $10,000.
- The applicant's sporadic attention to debt repayment and limited ability to pay were insufficient to demonstrate financial responsibility.
- Failure to report delinquent debts on the SF 86 raised concerns about judgment and reliability.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.A6.1.2.1raisedHistory of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- E2.A6.1.2.3raisedEvidence of Inability or Unwillingness to Satisfy Debts
- E2.A5.1.1raisedQuestionable Judgment, Unreliability, and Unwillingness to Comply with Rules
- E2.A5.1.2.2raisedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant and Material Facts
- E2.A6.1.3.3rejectedConditions That Resulted in the Behavior Were Largely Beyond the Person's ControlThe judge found no evidence that the debts resulted from conditions beyond the applicant's control.
- E2.A6.1.3.6rejectedGood Faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors or Resolve DebtsThe applicant's limited payments and intentions did not demonstrate a sufficient effort to resolve debts.
Key Rule Quoted
“"[N]o one has a 'right' to a security clearance."”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedOct 28, 2005
- Answer filedNov 15, 2005
- Hearing heldApr 4, 2006
- Decision dateJul 7, 2006
Cite For
- Financial Responsibility Under Guideline F
- Failure to Report Debts Under Guideline E
- Impact of Learning Disabilities on Security Clearance Evaluations