ISCR Case 96-0558.h1

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 96-0558.h1

deniedMar 11, 1997· Hon. Jerome H. Silber· hearing

Summary

A 44-year-old U.S. Government contractor employee, seeking to retain his Secret security clearance, was denied due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline H (Drug Involvement). The denial stemmed from a long history of polysubstance abuse, including illegal drug use and sales, which continued off-and-on until January 1995. This history included the use of glue, marijuana, LSD, heroin, cocaine, and unprescribed Valium and Percocet, with some drug use and sales occurring at his workplace. His criminal record included arrests for gambling, attempted breaking and entering, possession of controlled substances, and theft from his employer to support his drug habit.

Additionally, the applicant demonstrated a pattern of falsification on security questionnaires and in statements to investigators. He provided false or misleading information on a 1981 Personnel Security Questionnaire regarding drug addiction and later gave a sworn statement to the Defense Investigative Service in 1996 that contained denials of certain drug use at work, drug sales, and specific criminal arrests, which contradicted other evidence.

Despite recent rehabilitation efforts, including inpatient and outpatient treatment in 1995, consistent attendance at Narcotics Anonymous meetings since January 1995, and two years of being drug-free with negative urine screens, the judge determined that insufficient time had passed since his last drug use to mitigate the security concerns. The judge noted that given the applicant's extensive history of addiction, illegal drug involvement, and repeated relapses, a longer period of a drug-free lifestyle would be necessary to address the government's concerns.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and illegal drug sales.
The applicant provided false information in his security questionnaires, demonstrating a pattern of dishonesty.
Insufficient time had passed since the applicant's last drug use to mitigate security concerns.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

H.1raisedDrug Abuse
E.2raisedFalsification of Information
E.5raisedPattern of Dishonesty

Mitigating

H.4appliedCompletion of Drug Treatment Program
E.2rejectedIsolated Incident of FalsificationThe falsification was not isolated and occurred recently.
E.3rejectedPrompt Correction of FalsificationNo evidence of good-faith efforts to correct the falsification.

Key Rule Quoted

“The clearly consistent standard indicates that security-clearance determinations should err, if they must, on the side of denials.”
— Dept. of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 531 (1988)

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedAug 8, 1996
Answer filedSep 10, 1996Applicant elected to proceed without a hearing.
Hearing held—Determined on a written record.
Decision dateMar 11, 1997

Cite For

Denial Based on Extensive Drug Involvement Under Guideline H
Denial Due to Falsification of Information Under Guideline E
Insufficient Time Since Last Drug Use to Mitigate Security Concerns

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Conduct	Concealed Issue	Response	Disqualifying (¶16)	Mitigating applied (¶17)	Mitigation
2.a	The deliberate omission, concealment, or falsification of relevant and material facts from any personnel security questionnaire, personal history statement, or similar form used to conduct investigations, determine employment qualifications, award benefits or status, determine security clearance eligibility or trustworthiness, or award fiduciary responsibilities.	Against Applicant	Falsification Security FormFOUND DELIBERATE	Other	Admitted	—	—	—
2.b	Deliberately providing false or misleading information concerning relevant and material matters to an investigator, security official, competent medical authority, or other official representative in connection with a personnel security or trustworthiness determination.	Against Applicant	Lack of Candor in InterviewFOUND DELIBERATE	—	Admitted	—	—	—
3.a	A pattern of dishonesty or rule violations.	Against Applicant	Pattern of Dishonesty or Rule Violations	—	Admitted	—	—	—
3.b–3.e	4 sub-charges — specific text not stated in this decision (against the applicant). (low confidence)	Against Applicant		—		—	—	—

Allegation

Finding

Conduct

Concealed Issue

Response

Disqualifying (¶16)

Mitigating applied (¶17)

Mitigation

2.a

The deliberate omission, concealment, or falsification of relevant and material facts from any personnel security questionnaire, personal history statement, or similar form used to conduct investigations, determine employment qualifications, award benefits or status, determine security clearance eligibility or trustworthiness, or award fiduciary responsibilities.

Against Applicant

Falsification Security FormFOUND DELIBERATE

Other

Admitted

—

2.b

Deliberately providing false or misleading information concerning relevant and material matters to an investigator, security official, competent medical authority, or other official representative in connection with a personnel security or trustworthiness determination.

Against Applicant

Lack of Candor in InterviewFOUND DELIBERATE

—

Admitted

—

3.a

A pattern of dishonesty or rule violations.

Against Applicant

Pattern of Dishonesty or Rule Violations

—

Admitted

—

3.b–3.e

4 sub-charges — specific text not stated in this decision (against the applicant). (low confidence)

Against Applicant

—

¶	Allegation	Finding	Substance / event	Use level	Response	Disqualifying (¶25)	Mitigating applied (¶26)	Mitigation
1.a	The applicant is a long-time polysubstance abuser whose addiction has been diagnosed and treated by credentialed medical professionals.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Unspecified	Admitted	—	—	—
1.b	He sniffed glue for its intoxicating effects in the 1961-63 period at age 9 to age 11 and began to use marijuana and LSD in approximately 1967 when he was 15 years old.	Against Applicant	Marijuana	Experimental	Admitted	—	—	—
1.c	His use of heroin dates from 1970, his use of cocaine dates from 1976, and his use of Valium® and Percocet® that were not prescribed for him dates from 1976; this substance abuse continued off-and-on until January 1995.	For Applicant	Heroin	Regular	Admitted	—	—	—
1.d	He purchased various illegal drugs for his own use and sold relatively small quantities of them for profit.	Against Applicant	Drug Distribution or Dealing	Not Applicable	Admitted	—	—	—
1.e	At times his illegal drug possession, use and sales occurred at his place of employment, and on occasion he reported to work under the influence of such drug use.	Against Applicant	Drug Use During ClearanceWHILE CLEARED	Not Applicable	Admitted	—	—	—
1.f	The Applicant's criminal record includes arrests for gambling (1968), attempted breaking and entering (1972), possession of a controlled dangerous substance (marijuana and hashish)(1973), theft from his employer to support his drug habit (1980), possession of marijuana (1981), possession of a controlled dangerous substance (Valium® and Percocet®)(1985), attempting to purchase Valium® and Percocet® with a forged prescription (1986), and breaking and entering (1986).	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug InvolvementRelated Misconduct	Unspecified	Admitted	—	—	—
1.g	The Applicant received medical treatment for drug abuse in April 1973 and in several facilities during the period April 28 through May 21, 1976. He most recently received inpatient medical treatment from January 3 through January 23, 1995, at Facility A for a condition diagnosed as 'opioid' dependence and cocaine dependence.	Against Applicant	Drug Diagnosed Disorder	Not Applicable	Admitted	—	—	—
1.h	He continued thereafter to receive outpatient treatment at Facility B for more than a year, having successfully completed the program.	Against Applicant	Treatment Failure	Not Applicable	Admitted	—	—	—
1.i	The Applicant currently attends Narcotics Anonymous meetings four times a week and has been doing so since January 1995.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Admitted	—	—	Claimed Substance Treatment Ongoing
1.j	The Applicant has now been drug-free for the last two years and intends to remain so in the future.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Admitted	—	(a) behavior happened long ago / infrequent / unlikely to recur	Documented Abstinence Period Documented
1.k	All urine screens have been negative according to the employee assistance counselor of his employer; the counselor has continued to monitor the Applicant since January 1995.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Admitted	—	(d) satisfactory completion of treatment with a favorable prognosis	Documented Substance Treatment Completed
1.l	The Applicant has now remarried his ex-wife, and they attend church regularly; they visit nursing homes twice a week to help elderly residents.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Admitted	—	—	Documented Community Involvement
1.m	On March 14, 1996, the Applicant gave a signed sworn statement to an agent of the Defense Investigative Service (DIS), in which the Applicant stated: Breaking and Entering. I was never arrested or charged with breaking and entering. This is some sort of mix up. This may pertain to my son.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Denied with Explanation	—	—	Claimed Explanation of Omission Credible
1.n	Use at Work. I never used cocaine, crack, or heroin while at work or during my lunch hour. The only drugs I used at work were valium and percocet. I never kept any illegal drugs at work or had them on my person.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Denied with Explanation	—	—	Claimed Explanation of Omission Credible
1.o	Selling of Illegal Drugs. I never sold any illegal drugs.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Denied with Explanation	—	—	Claimed Explanation of Omission Credible
1.p	Denial of More Frequent Drug Use. I did not use $50.00 worth of heroin and/or $200.00 worth of cocaine both on a daily basis as [Facility A's] records stated. I also never used any drugs through using needles. If I made any such statement, it was only because my mind was so messed up for the drugs I had been using.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Denied with Explanation	—	—	Claimed Explanation of Omission Credible
1.q	The Applicant also falsified a Personnel Security Questionnaire (DD Form 48) that he signed on August 20, 1981, in which he answered negatively to the question: 'Are you now or have you ever been addicted to the use of habit forming drugs such as narcotics or barbiturates?'	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Denied with Explanation	—	—	Claimed Explanation of Omission Credible
1.r	On May 11, 1976, the Applicant had been diagnosed by a medical doctor as suffering from drug dependence for heroin, marijuana, and other psycho-stimulants.	Against Applicant	Drug Diagnosed Disorder	Not Applicable	Admitted	—	—	—
1.s	The Applicant had also been convicted of theft from his employer on January 31, 1981, in connection with his stealing to support his drug habits.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug InvolvementRelated Misconduct	Not Applicable	Admitted	—	—	—
1.t	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Admitted	—	—	—
1.u	Although his drug abuse was fairly recent, lengthy, and frequent, he has demonstrated an intent not to abuse any drugs in the future and has successfully completed a drug treatment program prescribed by a credentialed medical professional.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Admitted	—	(c) prescription abuse followed a prolonged illness and has since ended	Documented Rehabilitation Evidence
1.v	However, this Administrative Judge is concerned that there has not been sufficient time in which he has been drug-free to rebut the Government's case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.w	In light of his involvement in illegal drug purchases and sales for profit and related criminal activities, as well as repeated addiction diagnoses during several drug rehabilitation efforts, four or five years of a drug-free lifestyle would be necessary to rebut the Government's case under these facts.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.x	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.y	The recent falsification of the Applicant's DIS statement compounds his falsification of his 1981 Personnel Security Questionnaire.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.z	None of the MCs applicable to Criterion E are unqualifiedly applicable to the facts of this case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.aa	Each personnel security clearance decision must consider the appropriate factors enumerated in Section F.3 and enclosure 2 of the Directive, identified on pages 6-7 supra.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.bb	There is evidence of rehabilitation to some degree, but there is more than a mere possibility of a prolonged relapse - based on previous relapses - that continues to concern this Administrative Judge.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.cc	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.dd	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.ee	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.ff	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.gg	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.hh	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.ii	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.jj	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.kk	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.ll	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.mm	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.nn	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.oo	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.pp	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—
1.qq	The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Drug Involvement	Not Applicable	Unknown	—	—	—

Allegation

Finding

Substance / event

Use level

Response

Disqualifying (¶25)

Mitigating applied (¶26)

Mitigation

1.a

The applicant is a long-time polysubstance abuser whose addiction has been diagnosed and treated by credentialed medical professionals.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Unspecified

Admitted

—

1.b

He sniffed glue for its intoxicating effects in the 1961-63 period at age 9 to age 11 and began to use marijuana and LSD in approximately 1967 when he was 15 years old.

Against Applicant

Marijuana

Experimental

Admitted

—

1.c

His use of heroin dates from 1970, his use of cocaine dates from 1976, and his use of Valium® and Percocet® that were not prescribed for him dates from 1976; this substance abuse continued off-and-on until January 1995.

For Applicant

Heroin

Regular

Admitted

—

1.d

He purchased various illegal drugs for his own use and sold relatively small quantities of them for profit.

Against Applicant

Drug Distribution or Dealing

Not Applicable

Admitted

—

1.e

At times his illegal drug possession, use and sales occurred at his place of employment, and on occasion he reported to work under the influence of such drug use.

Against Applicant

Drug Use During ClearanceWHILE CLEARED

Not Applicable

Admitted

—

1.f

The Applicant's criminal record includes arrests for gambling (1968), attempted breaking and entering (1972), possession of a controlled dangerous substance (marijuana and hashish)(1973), theft from his employer to support his drug habit (1980), possession of marijuana (1981), possession of a controlled dangerous substance (Valium® and Percocet®)(1985), attempting to purchase Valium® and Percocet® with a forged prescription (1986), and breaking and entering (1986).

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug InvolvementRelated Misconduct

Unspecified

Admitted

—

1.g

The Applicant received medical treatment for drug abuse in April 1973 and in several facilities during the period April 28 through May 21, 1976. He most recently received inpatient medical treatment from January 3 through January 23, 1995, at Facility A for a condition diagnosed as 'opioid' dependence and cocaine dependence.

Against Applicant

Drug Diagnosed Disorder

Not Applicable

Admitted

—

1.h

He continued thereafter to receive outpatient treatment at Facility B for more than a year, having successfully completed the program.

Against Applicant

Treatment Failure

Not Applicable

Admitted

—

1.i

The Applicant currently attends Narcotics Anonymous meetings four times a week and has been doing so since January 1995.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Admitted

—

Claimed

Substance Treatment Ongoing

1.j

The Applicant has now been drug-free for the last two years and intends to remain so in the future.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Admitted

—

(a) behavior happened long ago / infrequent / unlikely to recur

Documented

Abstinence Period Documented

1.k

All urine screens have been negative according to the employee assistance counselor of his employer; the counselor has continued to monitor the Applicant since January 1995.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Admitted

—

(d) satisfactory completion of treatment with a favorable prognosis

Documented

Substance Treatment Completed

1.l

The Applicant has now remarried his ex-wife, and they attend church regularly; they visit nursing homes twice a week to help elderly residents.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Admitted

—

Documented

Community Involvement

1.m

On March 14, 1996, the Applicant gave a signed sworn statement to an agent of the Defense Investigative Service (DIS), in which the Applicant stated: Breaking and Entering. I was never arrested or charged with breaking and entering. This is some sort of mix up. This may pertain to my son.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Denied with Explanation

—

Claimed

Explanation of Omission Credible

1.n

Use at Work. I never used cocaine, crack, or heroin while at work or during my lunch hour. The only drugs I used at work were valium and percocet. I never kept any illegal drugs at work or had them on my person.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Denied with Explanation

—

Claimed

Explanation of Omission Credible

1.o

Selling of Illegal Drugs. I never sold any illegal drugs.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Denied with Explanation

—

Claimed

Explanation of Omission Credible

1.p

Denial of More Frequent Drug Use. I did not use $50.00 worth of heroin and/or $200.00 worth of cocaine both on a daily basis as [Facility A's] records stated. I also never used any drugs through using needles. If I made any such statement, it was only because my mind was so messed up for the drugs I had been using.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Denied with Explanation

—

Claimed

Explanation of Omission Credible

1.q

The Applicant also falsified a Personnel Security Questionnaire (DD Form 48) that he signed on August 20, 1981, in which he answered negatively to the question: 'Are you now or have you ever been addicted to the use of habit forming drugs such as narcotics or barbiturates?'

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Denied with Explanation

—

Claimed

Explanation of Omission Credible

1.r

On May 11, 1976, the Applicant had been diagnosed by a medical doctor as suffering from drug dependence for heroin, marijuana, and other psycho-stimulants.

Against Applicant

Drug Diagnosed Disorder

Not Applicable

Admitted

—

1.s

The Applicant had also been convicted of theft from his employer on January 31, 1981, in connection with his stealing to support his drug habits.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug InvolvementRelated Misconduct

Not Applicable

Admitted

—

1.t

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Admitted

—

1.u

Although his drug abuse was fairly recent, lengthy, and frequent, he has demonstrated an intent not to abuse any drugs in the future and has successfully completed a drug treatment program prescribed by a credentialed medical professional.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Admitted

—

(c) prescription abuse followed a prolonged illness and has since ended

Documented

Rehabilitation Evidence

1.v

However, this Administrative Judge is concerned that there has not been sufficient time in which he has been drug-free to rebut the Government's case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.w

In light of his involvement in illegal drug purchases and sales for profit and related criminal activities, as well as repeated addiction diagnoses during several drug rehabilitation efforts, four or five years of a drug-free lifestyle would be necessary to rebut the Government's case under these facts.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.x

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.y

The recent falsification of the Applicant's DIS statement compounds his falsification of his 1981 Personnel Security Questionnaire.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.z

None of the MCs applicable to Criterion E are unqualifiedly applicable to the facts of this case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.aa

Each personnel security clearance decision must consider the appropriate factors enumerated in Section F.3 and enclosure 2 of the Directive, identified on pages 6-7 supra.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.bb

There is evidence of rehabilitation to some degree, but there is more than a mere possibility of a prolonged relapse - based on previous relapses - that continues to concern this Administrative Judge.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.cc

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.dd

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.ee

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.ff

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.gg

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.hh

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.ii

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.jj

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.kk

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.ll

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.mm

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.nn

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.oo

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.pp

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

1.qq

The Applicant has a lengthy history of drug addiction and involvement in illegal drug sales and purchases that make the DCs, identified on page 5 supra, applicable to his case.

Against Applicant

Unspecified Drug Involvement

Not Applicable

Unknown

—

Loading case…

Case Profile

Summary

Why the Applicant Was Denied

Conditions Referenced

Key Rule Quoted

Procedural Posture

Cite For

Full decision

DEFENSE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

HEARING

APPEARANCES

STATEMENT OF CASE

FINDINGS OF FACT

POLICIES

CONCLUSION

FORMAL FINDINGS

DECISION

FOOTNOTES