CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 20-03169 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 20-03169

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date10/21/2021
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Noreen A. Lynch
Government Counsel: Rhett E. Petcher
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 34-year-old individual seeking a security clearance, facing allegations under Adjudicative Guideline F (financial considerations). The Statement of Reasons (SOR) outlined concerns regarding approximately $19,000 in delinquent debts, including a vehicle repossession, a charged-off account, and a cell phone collection account. The applicant admitted to some of the allegations while denying others, attributing her financial difficulties to factors such as marital separation, unemployment, health issues, and natural disasters.
The administrative judge found that the applicant had not sufficiently mitigated the financial concerns. Although she made some payments towards her debts, she did not provide adequate documentation to demonstrate a consistent effort to resolve her financial issues or a plan for future stability. The judge noted that while the applicant experienced circumstances beyond her control, she failed to act responsibly in managing her debts prior to the SOR. Ultimately, the judge ruled against the applicant, stating that the lack of evidence supporting her financial responsibility and the need to prioritize national security led to the denial of her eligibility for access to classified information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 20-03169

deniedOct 21, 2021· Hon. Noreen A. Lynch· hearing

Summary

A 34-year-old married applicant with two children was denied a security clearance under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) due to approximately $19,000 in delinquent debts. The Statement of Reasons detailed five specific allegations: a vehicle repossession for $3,463, a charged-off account for $12,196, a cell phone collection account for $3,211, a cable collection account for $473, and another collection account for $126. These issues raised disqualifying conditions under Adjudicative Guidelines Paragraphs 19(a) and 19(c).

The denial was based on the applicant's failure to provide sufficient documentation to support her burden of proof regarding financial responsibility. While she attributed her financial difficulties to various personal circumstances, her admissions and credit reports confirmed her responsibility for the delinquent debts.

Ultimately, the applicant did not demonstrate a good-faith effort to resolve her debts or provide evidence of financial counseling. This lack of a meaningful track record of financial responsibility and insufficient supporting documentation led to the denial of her security clearance application.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant did not present sufficient documentation to support her burden of proof regarding financial responsibility.
The applicant's admissions and credit reports confirmed her responsibility for delinquent debts totaling about $19,000.
The applicant failed to demonstrate a good-faith effort to resolve her debts or provide evidence of financial counseling.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Key Rule Quoted

“Any doubt concerning personnel being considered for national security eligibility will be resolved in favor of the national security.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedApr 7, 2021
Answer filed—Applicant elected to have her case decided on the written record.
Hearing held—Decision based on documentary evidence.
Decision dateOct 21, 2021

Cite For

Failure to Provide Sufficient Documentation to Mitigate Financial Concerns
Lack of a Meaningful Track Record of Financial Responsibility
Denial of Security Clearance Due to Unresolved Financial Obligations

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found multiple financial concerns under Guideline F, including a vehicle repossession, charged-off accounts, and collection accounts. While some debts were admitted and attributed to personal circumstances, the overall financial irresponsibility led to a decision against the applicant's eligibility for a security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Vehicle repossession in the amount of $3,463 $3,463	Against Applicant	Auto Loan Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	Claimed Other
1.b	Charged-off account in the amount of $12,196 $12,196	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	Claimed Other
1.c	Cell phone collection account in the amount of $3,211 $3,211	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	Claimed Other
1.d	Cable collection account in the amount of $473 $473	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Denied	—	—	Documented Debt Paid in Full
1.e	Collection account in the amount of $126 $126	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Denied	(a) inability to satisfy debts	—	Claimed Other

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.