Summary
An applicant, representing himself, sought reconsideration of a prior security clearance denial, alleging discrimination based on his birthplace. The Board reviewed the request but ultimately denied the security clearance.
The denial was based on multiple security concerns, including foreign influence, foreign preference, personal conduct, and financial considerations. The applicant failed to provide evidence to substantiate his claims of discrimination or offer persuasive reasons to alter the Board's initial decision.
A significant factor in the denial was the applicant's family ties in a hostile country. This connection placed a heavy burden on the applicant to demonstrate that these relationships did not pose a security risk, a burden he did not meet. Consequently, the request for reconsideration was denied, and the security clearance remained denied.
Why the applicant was denied
- The applicant did not substantiate claims of discrimination with evidence.
- The applicant failed to articulate a persuasive reason to change the Board’s resolution.
- The applicant has family members in a hostile country, increasing the burden of proof regarding security risks.
Key rule quoted
“An applicant with family members living in a country hostile to the U.S. bears a "heavy burden" in demonstrating that those family members do not pose a security risk.”
Procedural posture
- Decision DateMay 23, 2008
- Request for Reconsideration FiledApr 21, 2008
- Prior Decision DateMar 28, 2008
- Chief Department Counsel Reply BriefMay 5, 2008No reply brief was filed.
Cite for
- Heavy Burden of Proof for Applicants with Family Ties in Hostile Countries
- Insufficient Evidence to Support Claims of Discrimination
- Discretion of the Board in Reconsideration Requests