CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 21-01010 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 21-01010

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date10/1/2023
Statusgranted
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Carol G. Ricciardello
Government Counsel: David F. Hayes
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 62-year-old individual with a background in the military and experience working for federal contractors. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guideline F, related to financial considerations. The core allegations included the applicant's failure to meet financial obligations, primarily stemming from debts incurred while financially assisting a lifelong friend who subsequently defaulted on repayments.
The applicant admitted to the allegations in the SOR and provided explanations for his financial situation. He had initially made timely payments on his debts until he engaged a credit resolution service, which advised him to stop payments, leading to delinquency. The applicant acknowledged his lack of diligence in researching the service's reputation and took steps to terminate the agreement once he realized its poor performance. He actively worked to resolve his debts, settling some and maintaining a budget to manage his finances.
The administrative judge ruled in favor of the applicant, concluding that he had mitigated the security concerns under Guideline F. The judge noted the applicant's proactive efforts to address his financial issues, including settling debts and maintaining a budget, which demonstrated responsibility and a commitment to resolving his financial difficulties. The decision ultimately granted the applicant eligibility for access to classified information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 21-01010

grantedOct 1, 2023· Hon. Carol G. Ricciardello· hearing

Summary

This case concerns a 62-year-old military veteran with a master's degree whose eligibility for a security clearance was reviewed under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). Concerns arose because the applicant incurred debts while assisting a friend who subsequently failed to make required payments. This led to delinquent debts, and the applicant initially faced challenges contacting a creditor to resolve them.

However, the applicant demonstrated significant mitigating efforts. He negotiated a settlement with the creditor, made payments, and actively worked to resolve the outstanding debt, ultimately providing documentation of its resolution. He took responsibility for his financial obligations, maintained a detailed budget, and lived within his means, resulting in no outstanding debts at the time of the decision.

The decision to grant the clearance acknowledged that the circumstances leading to his financial issues were largely beyond his control, stemming from his friend's failure to repay loans. Given his responsible financial behavior and successful resolution of all debts, the applicant was granted eligibility for access to classified information.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant took responsibility for his financial obligations and demonstrated efforts to resolve his debts.
He maintained a detailed budget and lived within his means, with no outstanding debts at the time of the decision.
The circumstances leading to his financial issues were largely beyond his control, stemming from a friend's failure to repay loans.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)raisedHistory of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(a)appliedBehavior Unlikely to Recur
AG ¶ 20(b)appliedConditions Largely Beyond Control
AG ¶ 20(c)notedReceiving Financial Counseling
AG ¶ 20(d)appliedGood-faith Effort to Repay Debts

Key Rule Quoted

“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedAug 13, 2021
Answer filedNov 11, 2021
Hearing heldNov 29, 2022
Decision dateOct 1, 2023

Cite For

Mitigation of Financial Concerns Under Guideline F
Responsible Financial Behavior as a Factor in Security Clearance Decisions
Impact of Personal Circumstances on Financial Obligations

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: granted

The judge found that the applicant successfully mitigated the financial concerns under Guideline F. The applicant demonstrated responsible actions in addressing his debts, including settling debts and making payments, which led to a favorable outcome in the decision.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant incurred debts when he decided to help his friend. The friend failed to make the payments required on the debts.	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—
1.b	Applicant has delinquent debts that he was unable to pay.	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—
1.c	Applicant has attempted to resolve the debt but has faced challenges in contacting the creditor.	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—
1.d	Applicant negotiated a settlement with the creditor and has made payments.	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—
1.e	Applicant is actively attempting to resolve the debt with the creditor.	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—
1.f	Applicant resolved the debt and provided supporting documents.	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Unknown	—	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.