CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 19-02450 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 19-02450

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date7/24/2023
Statusgranted
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Braden M. Murphy
Government Counsel: Brittany C. M. White
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 37-year-old individual who sought a security clearance after incurring delinquent debts during his marriage. The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA) issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guideline F, related to financial considerations. The SOR detailed six debts totaling approximately $19,562, which the applicant admitted were incurred jointly with his former wife, who declined to assume responsibility for them after their divorce.
The applicant provided evidence of his financial situation, including a significant increase in income following a career change to the information technology field. He admitted to all debts listed in the SOR and explained that his financial difficulties were exacerbated by a limited income during and after his marriage. He demonstrated efforts to improve his financial stability by working with a credit counseling firm, reducing expenses, and settling some debts. The applicant's current financial situation showed a surplus income, and he expressed a commitment to resolving his debts.
The administrative judge ruled in favor of the applicant, granting eligibility for access to classified information. The judge concluded that the applicant had made substantial progress in addressing his financial obligations and had taken responsible steps to improve his financial literacy and stability. The judge found that the applicant's past financial issues were unlikely to recur, thus mitigating the security concerns raised under Guideline F.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 19-02450

grantedJul 24, 2023· Hon. Braden M. Murphy· hearing

Summary

This case involved a 37-year-old veteran whose security clearance eligibility was reviewed under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The Statement of Reasons alleged that the applicant incurred delinquent debts during his marriage, for which he assumed sole responsibility post-divorce. It further noted that he had made arrangements to settle these debts, was actively addressing them, and had no other past-due taxes or delinquent obligations. The allegations also highlighted his improved financial situation through reduced expenses and increased income, demonstrating responsible debt management.

Disqualifying conditions under Adjudicative Guidelines Paragraphs 19(a) and 19(c) were initially raised. However, the administrative judge applied mitigating conditions under Paragraphs 20(b), 20(c), and 20(d). The judge found that the applicant had significantly improved his financial situation by increasing his income and reducing expenses.

Crucially, the applicant took responsibility for his debts, actively working to resolve them and establishing settlement arrangements for most outstanding obligations. His demonstrated financial stability led to the conclusion that eligibility for access to classified information should be GRANTED.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant improved his financial situation through increased income and reduced expenses.
He has taken responsibility for his debts and is actively working to resolve them.
The applicant demonstrated financial stability and has settlement arrangements in place for most debts.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(b)appliedConditions Largely Beyond the Person's Control
AG ¶ 20(c)appliedReceived Counseling for the Problem
AG ¶ 20(d)appliedGood-faith Effort to Repay Debts

Key Rule Quoted

“The clearly consistent standard indicates that security determinations should err, if they must, on the side of denials.”
— Department of Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 531 (1988)

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedJan 25, 2022
Answer filed—undated SOR Response
Hearing heldMay 22, 2023via video teleconference
Decision dateJul 24, 2023

Cite For

Mitigation of Financial Considerations Under Guideline F
Importance of Demonstrating Financial Responsibility
Impact of Personal Circumstances on Financial Obligations

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: granted

The judge found that the applicant incurred delinquent debts during his marriage but has since taken responsibility for them and is actively addressing the debts. The applicant's financial situation has improved, and he has made arrangements to settle the debts, leading to a decision in his favor regarding the financial considerations under Guideline F.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant incurred delinquent debts during marriage and assumed sole responsibility for them. $5,728	For Applicant	Credit Card Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	Claimed Financial Counseling Claimed Budget Change with Documentation
1.b	Applicant has made arrangements to settle debts and is actively addressing them. $5,506	For Applicant	Credit Card Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	Claimed Financial Counseling Claimed Budget Change with Documentation
1.c	Applicant's debts were incurred during marriage and he has taken responsibility for them post-divorce. $2,267	For Applicant	Credit Card Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	Claimed Financial Counseling Claimed Budget Change with Documentation
1.d	Applicant has no past-due taxes or other delinquent debts. $1,393	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	—
1.e	Applicant has improved his financial situation and is addressing debts responsibly. $2,437	For Applicant	Auto Loan Debt	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	Claimed Financial Counseling Claimed Budget Change with Documentation
1.f	Applicant has taken steps to cut expenses and improve his financial situation. $2,231	For Applicant	Utility or Phone Debt	Admitted	—	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	Claimed Financial Counseling Claimed Budget Change with Documentation

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.