CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 23-01163 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 23-01163

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date10/26/2023
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeADP POSITION
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Edward W. Loughran
Government Counsel: Mark D. Lawton
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 34-year-old employee of a defense contractor who sought a public trust position. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing trustworthiness concerns under Guideline F (financial considerations), primarily due to the applicant's history of financial problems, including a dismissed Chapter 7 bankruptcy and multiple delinquent debts totaling approximately $80,000.
The applicant admitted to owing the debts outlined in the SOR but attributed his financial difficulties to a lack of experience and alleged predatory lending practices. He had filed for bankruptcy in 2019, which was later dismissed, and claimed to have made some payments toward certain debts in 2023. However, he did not provide sufficient evidence of a consistent repayment plan or financial counseling, and many debts remained unresolved. The administrative judge noted that while some debts had been charged off, this did not absolve the applicant of his obligations.
Ultimately, the administrative judge ruled against the applicant, concluding that he did not adequately mitigate the financial considerations trustworthiness concerns. The judge emphasized that the applicant's intentions to resolve his debts were insufficient without a demonstrated track record of responsible financial behavior, leading to a denial of eligibility for access to sensitive information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 23-01163

deniedOct 26, 2023· Hon. Edward W. Loughran· hearing

Summary

A 34-year-old defense contractor employee was denied a public trust position due to financial considerations under Guideline F. The applicant's financial history included a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filed in March 2019 and over $80,000 in delinquent debts. Specific allegations noted an outstanding debt of $6,947 to a third credit union with no payments made, and other debts totaling more than $68,000 toward which only minimal payments were made.

While some debts were resolved, including two totaling $6,134 cancelled via IRS Form 1099-C, and others settled for $1,572, $1,452, and $868, the applicant's financial problems were deemed recent and ongoing. The applicant had established a $25 per month payment plan for all debts, but this was not considered a substitute for a track record of repayment.

The decision highlighted that the financial issues did not result from conditions beyond the applicant's control and continued to raise concerns about reliability, trustworthiness, and judgment. The denial was based on the applicant's history of financial problems, their ongoing nature, and a lack of demonstrated good-faith effort to resolve debts in a timely manner.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant has a history of financial problems, including a dismissed Chapter 7 bankruptcy and multiple delinquent debts.
The applicant's financial issues are recent and ongoing, casting doubt on his reliability and judgment.
The applicant did not demonstrate a good-faith effort to resolve his debts in a timely manner.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)appliedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)appliedHistory of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Key Rule Quoted

“A person who seeks access to sensitive information enters into a fiduciary relationship with the Government predicated upon trust and confidence.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedJun 5, 2023
Answer filedJul 19, 2023Requested decision based on written record.
Hearing held—Decision based on written record.
Decision dateOct 26, 2023

Cite For

Trustworthiness Concerns Under Guideline F Due to Financial Issues
Impact of Unresolved Debts on Eligibility for Public Trust Positions
Importance of Demonstrating Good-faith Efforts to Resolve Financial Obligations

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found multiple financial concerns under Guideline F, including a Chapter 7 bankruptcy and significant delinquent debts totaling over $80,000. Despite some debts being settled or charged off, the applicant's ongoing financial issues and lack of a solid repayment track record led to a decision against the applicant.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case in March 2019.	For Applicant	Bankruptcy Filing	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.b	Applicant has a history of financial problems and delinquent debts.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.c	Applicant owes a third credit union $6,947. $6,947	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.d	Applicant has not made any payments toward this debt.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.e	Applicant's financial issues are recent and ongoing.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.f	Two debts totaling $6,134 were cancelled through an IRS Form 1099-C. $6,134	For Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Admitted	—	—	—
1.g	Applicant paid or settled the debts alleged in SOR 1.g ($1,572). $1,572	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	—
1.h	Applicant paid or settled the debts alleged in SOR 1.h ($1,452). $1,452	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	—
1.i	Applicant paid or settled the debts alleged in SOR 1.i ($868). $868	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	—
1.j	Applicant made minimal payments toward his other debts, which total more than $68,000. $68,000	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.k	Applicant's intentions to resolve financial problems in the future are not a substitute for a track record of debt repayment.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.l	Applicant's debts alleged in SOR 1.l were charged off and cancelled through an IRS Form 1099-C.	For Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Admitted	—	—	—
1.m	Applicant's financial problems did not result from conditions that were largely beyond his control.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.n	Applicant's financial issues continue to cast doubt on his current reliability, trustworthiness, and good judgment.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.o	Applicant has established a $25 per month payment plan for all the debts. $25	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	—
1.p	Applicant's financial issues are ongoing and have not been resolved.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.