CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 23-02840 — CASE

Case record

ISCR Case 23-02840

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date7/19/2024
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Mark W. Harvey
Government Counsel: Rhett E. Petcher
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 40-year-old owner-operator truck driver who applied for a security clearance but faced allegations under Guideline F, concerning financial considerations. The Statement of Reasons (SOR) indicated that the applicant had significant delinquent federal and state tax liabilities, totaling over $100,000, which raised concerns about her financial stability and responsibility.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to the allegations regarding her tax debts and provided some mitigating information, including her and her husband's substantial income as truck drivers and their efforts to make monthly payments towards their tax obligations. However, she also acknowledged that unforeseen expenses and medical issues had severely impacted their financial situation, leading to a reliance on installment agreements with the IRS. Despite these admissions, the applicant's financial difficulties were deemed insufficient to mitigate the security concerns raised by her tax liabilities.
The administrative judge ruled to deny the applicant's eligibility for access to classified information, concluding that the financial issues were not adequately resolved and posed a potential risk to national security. The judge emphasized the importance of financial responsibility in maintaining trustworthiness for access to classified information, ultimately determining that the applicant had not met the necessary criteria for a security clearance.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 23-02840

deniedJul 19, 2024· Hon. Mark W. Harvey· hearing

Summary

A 40-year-old owner-operator truck driver was denied a security clearance due to significant financial concerns under Guideline F. The primary issue involved approximately $101,100 in delinquent federal income taxes across six tax years: 2013, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2021, and 2022. Specifically, $3,300 was owed for tax year 2022.

The administrative judge considered the applicant's admissions and mitigating information regarding her financial situation. However, the judge found that the applicant had a long history of delinquent federal income taxes, dating back to 2013, and had not demonstrated sufficient progress in resolving these debts.

Ultimately, the financial difficulties raised unmitigated questions about the applicant's reliability and trustworthiness, leading to the denial of eligibility for access to classified information.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant has a long history of delinquent federal income taxes dating back to 2013.
The applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient progress in resolving her federal income tax debts.
The applicant's financial difficulties raise unmitigated questions about her reliability and trustworthiness.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)appliedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)appliedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
AG ¶ 19(f)appliedFailure to Pay Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax as Required

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(b)rejectedConditions Largely Beyond the Person's ControlThe applicant did not establish that she acted responsibly under the circumstances.
AG ¶ 20(d)rejectedGood-faith Effort to Repay Overdue CreditorsThe applicant has not made payments to address her current tax obligations.

Key Rule Quoted

“Eligibility for a security clearance is predicated upon the applicant meeting the criteria contained in the adjudicative guidelines.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedJan 23, 2024
Answer filedJan 30, 2024
Hearing heldMay 13, 2024via Microsoft Teams
Decision dateJul 19, 2024

Cite For

Denial of Security Clearance Due to Unresolved Financial Obligations Under Guideline F
Impact of Long-standing Tax Debts on Security Clearance Eligibility
Insufficient Mitigation of Financial Concerns Despite Some Mitigating Circumstances

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant has significant delinquent federal income tax debts totaling approximately $101,100 for multiple tax years, which raised security concerns under Guideline F. While the applicant was making monthly payments towards some of these debts, the judge ultimately ruled against the applicant on the larger tax debt, citing a history of not meeting financial obligations and failure to pay taxes as required.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant owes delinquent federal income taxes in the approximate amount of $101,100 for six tax years (TY): 2013, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2021, and 2022. $101,100	Against Applicant	Tax Unpaid	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations (f) failure to file / fraudulent filing of tax returns or unpaid tax	—	Claimed Other
1.b	Applicant owes $3,300 for TY 2022. $3,300	For Applicant	Tax Unpaid	Admitted	—	—	Claimed Other

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.