CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 24-00224 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 24-00224

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date3/18/2025
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Braden M. Murphy
Government Counsel: Adrienne M. Driskill
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 56-year-old individual who applied for a security clearance on November 20, 2022. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) on April 4, 2024, citing security concerns under Guideline F, related to financial considerations. The core allegations included numerous delinquent debts totaling approximately $68,000, which encompassed both consumer credit debts and past-due federal income taxes.
In her response to the SOR, the applicant admitted to most of the debts listed but denied knowledge of two specific debts and claimed that one had been paid. She indicated that she was setting up payment plans to address her debts but did not provide sufficient documentation to substantiate her claims of good-faith efforts to mitigate the financial concerns. The applicant explained that her financial difficulties stemmed from a business failure and unemployment, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The administrative judge ruled to deny the applicant's eligibility for access to classified information, concluding that the applicant's financial irresponsibility raised significant concerns about her reliability and trustworthiness. The judge noted that the applicant failed to provide adequate evidence of her efforts to resolve her debts and emphasized that financial issues could indicate poor self-control and judgment, which are critical qualities for safeguarding classified information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 24-00224

deniedMar 18, 2025· Hon. Braden M. Murphy· hearing

Summary

A 56-year-old truck driver was denied a security clearance under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) due to a history of delinquent debts, including significant federal tax obligations. The Statement of Reasons alleged numerous past-due debts to private creditors and federal income taxes, a history of not meeting financial obligations, and a failure to pay required annual income taxes. These issues raised Disqualifying Conditions AG ¶ 19(a), AG ¶ 19(c), and AG ¶ 19(f).

While the applicant admitted to some debts and claimed to have established payment plans, she did not provide sufficient documentary evidence of good-faith efforts to resolve these financial concerns. The judge applied Mitigating Condition AG ¶ 20(d) but ultimately concluded that the applicant's financial irresponsibility raised serious questions about her reliability and trustworthiness.

Consequently, the security clearance was DENIED.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant incurred numerous delinquent debts, including significant federal tax obligations.
The applicant failed to provide sufficient documentary proof of good-faith efforts to mitigate financial concerns.
The judge concluded that the applicant's financial irresponsibility raised serious questions about her reliability and trustworthiness.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)appliedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)appliedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
AG ¶ 19(f)appliedFailure to Pay Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax as Required

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(d)appliedThe Individual Initiated and Is Adhering to a Good-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors or Otherwise Resolve DebtsSome debts have been, or are being, paid.

Key Rule Quoted

“Failure to live within one's means, satisfy debts, and meet financial obligations may indicate poor self-control, lack of judgment, or unwillingness to abide by rules and regulations, all of which can raise questions about an individual's reliability, trustworthiness, and ability to protect classified or sensitive information.”
— AG ¶ 18

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedApr 4, 2024
Answer filedMay 11, 2024
Hearing held—Decided by administrative judge on written record.
Decision dateMar 18, 2025

Cite For

Denial of Security Clearance Due to Financial Irresponsibility Under Guideline F
Insufficient Evidence of Good-faith Efforts to Mitigate Financial Concerns
Impact of Delinquent Debts on Reliability and Trustworthiness Assessments

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: Decision on RecordDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant has numerous delinquent debts totaling approximately $68,000, including past-due federal income taxes. Despite some admissions and claims of setting up payment plans, the judge ruled against the applicant on all financial allegations, concluding that the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence of good-faith efforts to mitigate the financial concerns.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant has incurred numerous delinquent debts, including debts to private creditors as well as past-due federal income taxes. $68,000	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.b	Applicant has a history of not meeting financial obligations. $68,000	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	—	—
1.c	Applicant failed to pay annual Federal, state, or local income tax as required. $30,000	Against Applicant	Tax Unpaid	Admitted	(a) inability to satisfy debts (f) failure to file / fraudulent filing of tax returns or unpaid tax	—	—

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.