CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 24-00611 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 24-00611

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date5/16/2025
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Robert E. Coacher
Government Counsel: Andrew H. Henderson
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 34-year-old employee of a U.S. defense contractor, working as an over-the-road truck driver since April 2023. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under Guideline F, related to financial considerations. The core allegations included the applicant's failure to timely file federal income tax returns for the years 2018, 2020, and 2021, and his delinquency on federal taxes and two consumer debts.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to some allegations, specifically owing approximately $14,000 in federal taxes and being delinquent on one of the consumer debts, which he claimed was unenforceable due to its age. He denied other allegations and explained that his failure to file taxes was due to reliance on a former girlfriend for tax preparation and a lack of understanding regarding the taxability of unemployment benefits. Although he claimed to have filed the overdue returns in April 2024, he did not provide documentation to support this assertion. The administrative judge found that while the applicant had made some efforts to address his tax debt, he failed to mitigate the overall financial concerns, leading to a ruling against his eligibility for a security clearance. The judge concluded that the applicant's financial issues raised doubts about his reliability and trustworthiness, which are critical for access to classified information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 24-00611

deniedMay 16, 2025· Hon. Robert E. Coacher· hearing

Summary

A 34-year-old defense contractor was denied a security clearance due to financial considerations under Guideline F. The Statement of Reasons outlined several concerns, including the applicant's failure to timely file federal income tax returns for 2018, 2020, and 2021. Additionally, the applicant owed approximately $14,000 in delinquent federal taxes for tax years 2018 through 2023, which remained unpaid after April 2024.

Further financial issues included delinquency on two debts, approximately $9,700 and $2,900 respectively. While the applicant successfully resolved a debt related to apartment damage by April 2024, the other financial concerns persisted.

The administrative judge determined that the applicant had not sufficiently mitigated the financial concerns. Specifically, the judge noted the unfiled tax returns, the outstanding federal tax debt, and the unresolved delinquent consumer debts. Consequently, eligibility for a security clearance was denied.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant failed to timely file federal income tax returns for multiple years.
The applicant owed approximately $14,000 in federal taxes, which remained unpaid after April 2024.
The applicant was delinquent on two consumer debts, one of which he did not address responsibly.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
AG ¶ 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
AG ¶ 19(f)raisedFailure to File or Fraudulently Filing Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax Returns

Mitigating

AG ¶ 20(d)appliedThe Individual Initiated and Is Adhering to a Good-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors or Otherwise Resolve Debts
AG ¶ 20(g)appliedThe Individual Has Made Arrangements with the Appropriate Tax Authority to File or Pay the Amount Owed and Is in Compliance with Those Arrangements

Key Rule Quoted

“Eligibility for access to classified information is denied.”

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedApr 24, 2024
Answer filed—
Hearing heldMar 14, 2025via Microsoft Teams
Decision dateMay 16, 2025

Cite For

Failure to Mitigate Financial Concerns Under Guideline F
Impact of Delinquent Debts on Security Clearance Eligibility
Consideration of Whole-person Concept in Security Clearance Decisions

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: denied

The judge found that the applicant failed to timely file federal income tax returns for 2018, 2020, and 2021, and was delinquent on two debts, resulting in financial concerns under Guideline F. While the applicant was found to have mitigated the concerns related to unpaid federal taxes and damage charges, the overall financial issues led to a denial of the security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Failed to timely file his federal income tax returns for tax years 2018, 2020, and 2021, as required.	Against Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Denied	—	—	Claimed Other
1.b	Owed delinquent federal taxes of approximately $14,000 for tax years 2018 through 2023, which remained unpaid after April 2024. $14,000	For Applicant	Tax Unpaid	Admitted	(b) unwillingness to satisfy debts regardless of ability (c) a history of not meeting financial obligations	(g) arrangements made with the tax authority; in compliance	Documented Payment Plan with IRS
1.c	Delinquent on two debts in the approximate amounts of $9,700 and $2,900, respectively.	Against Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Denied	(b) unwillingness to satisfy debts regardless of ability	—	Claimed Other
1.d	Charged for damage to his apartment, which was paid in April 2024. $2,900	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	(g) arrangements made with the tax authority; in compliance	Documented Debt Paid in Full

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.