CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 24-01392 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 24-01392

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date3/27/2025
Statusgranted
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Roger C. Wesley
Government Counsel: John B. Renehan
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 36-year-old employee of a defense contractor seeking a security clearance. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing financial considerations as the primary concern, specifically alleging that the applicant had accumulated 12 delinquent debts totaling over $16,000. These debts were deemed unresolved and raised questions about the applicant's reliability and trustworthiness.
During the proceedings, the applicant admitted to the allegations in the SOR but did not provide explanations for the debts. However, he later submitted documentation showing that he had made good-faith payments to several creditors, totaling over $13,000, which left less than $3,700 in unresolved debts. The applicant attributed his financial difficulties to periods of unemployment following the COVID-19 pandemic. He demonstrated a stable income and a positive financial outlook, partly due to living with his parents to reduce expenses.
The administrative judge ruled in favor of the applicant, granting eligibility for access to classified information. The judge concluded that the applicant had sufficiently mitigated the financial concerns by demonstrating a commitment to addressing his debts and maintaining a stable financial situation. The judge emphasized the importance of evaluating the applicant's overall circumstances and noted the positive endorsements from his employer regarding his character and reliability.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · For Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 24-01392

grantedMar 27, 2025· Hon. Roger C. Wesley· hearing

Summary

A 36-year-old defense contractor employee was granted a security clearance despite initial concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The Statement of Reasons alleged the applicant had accumulated 12 delinquent debts totaling over $16,000, raising disqualifying conditions 19(a) and 19(c).

However, the administrative judge found that mitigating conditions 20(b) and 20(d) applied. The applicant provided evidence of good-faith payments toward most of his delinquent debts, resolving over $13,000 of the total. His financial difficulties were attributed to periods of unemployment, which largely resolved after the COVID-19 pandemic.

The applicant's current financial situation demonstrated a healthy net monthly remainder, indicating improved financial management. Based on these efforts and improved circumstances, the judge concluded that the financial issues were largely mitigated and consistent with national interest, leading to the granting of his security clearance eligibility.

Why the Applicant Prevailed

The applicant provided evidence of good-faith payments to most of his delinquent debts, totaling over $13,000.
The applicant's financial issues were attributed to periods of unemployment, which were largely resolved post-COVID-19.
The applicant's current financial situation showed a healthy net monthly remainder, indicating improved financial management.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

19(a)raisedInability to Satisfy Debts
19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations

Mitigating

20(b)appliedThe Conditions That Resulted in the Financial Problem Were Largely Beyond the Person’s Control
20(d)appliedThe Individual Initiated and Is Adhering to a Good-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors or Otherwise Resolve Debts

Key Rule Quoted

“Eligibility for access to classified information may only be granted "upon a finding that it is clearly consistent with the national interest to do so."”
— Exec. Or. 10865, Safeguarding Classified Information within Industry § 2 (Feb. 20, 1960)

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedAug 27, 2024
Answer filedSep 19, 2024
Hearing heldFeb 21, 2025
Decision dateMar 27, 2025

Cite For

Mitigation of Financial Concerns Under Guideline F
Good-faith Efforts to Resolve Delinquent Debts
Whole-person Assessment in Security Clearance Decisions

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: granted

The applicant accumulated 12 delinquent debts exceeding $16,000, primarily attributed to periods of unemployment following the Covid-19 pandemic. The judge found that the applicant had made a good-faith effort to repay overdue creditors and that the financial issues were largely beyond the applicant's control, leading to a decision to grant eligibility for a security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	Applicant allegedly accumulated 12 delinquent debts, exceeding $16,000. $16,000	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	(b) conditions largely beyond the person’s control; acted responsibly (d) good-faith effort to repay or otherwise resolve debts	Claimed Financial Event Outside Control Claimed Payment Plan with Creditor

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.