CASE · Clearance Adjudication Search EngineCASE

Loading case…

ISCR Case 24-01570 — CASE

DOHA Record Explorer

ISCR Case 24-01570

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research — not advice or a prediction.

Case Profile
Decision Date3/28/2025
Statusdenied
LevelHEARING
TypeSTANDARD ISCR
Participants
Applicant Representation: Pro Se
Judge: Roger C. Wesley
Government Counsel: Alison P. O'Connell
Case Summary
The applicant in this case was a 36-year-old civilian engineer employed by a defense contractor, seeking a security clearance. The adjudicative guideline at issue was financial considerations, with the Statement of Reasons (SOR) alleging that the applicant had accumulated five delinquent consumer debts exceeding $15,000, owed federal taxes, and failed to file tax returns for the years 2020-2023. The applicant admitted to most of the allegations but denied some related to his tax filings.
Key findings indicated that the applicant's financial difficulties stemmed from underemployment during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to significant debt accumulation. Although he made some efforts to address his debts post-interview, including settling some accounts and establishing payment plans, several debts remained unresolved. The applicant also failed to timely file his federal and state tax returns, attributing this to financial constraints. Despite some documentation of payments and settlements, the administrative judge found that the applicant did not sufficiently mitigate the financial concerns raised.
Ultimately, the administrative judge ruled against the applicant, denying eligibility for access to classified information. The judge concluded that the applicant's financial issues indicated a lack of reliability and trustworthiness, which are critical for holding a security clearance. The decision emphasized the importance of financial responsibility in assessing an individual's suitability for access to sensitive information.
Guidelines Evaluated
- Guideline FFinancial Considerations · Against Applicant
Similar decisions
Other decisions whose allegations read most like this one. Descriptive similarity of the allegations only — not a prediction.
Finding similar decisions…

Case Headnote

ISCR Case No. 24-01570

deniedMar 28, 2025· Hon. Roger C. Wesley· hearing

Summary

A 36-year-old civilian engineer was denied a security clearance under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) due to unresolved financial issues. The Statement of Reasons cited five delinquent consumer debts exceeding $15,000, accrued federal taxes of $279 for tax year 2018, and a failure to file federal and state tax returns for tax years 2020-2023. These issues raised disqualifying conditions 19(a), 19(c), and 19(f).

While mitigating conditions 20(b) and 20(d) were considered, they were deemed insufficient. The judge found that the applicant's financial issues, specifically the five delinquent debts and the failure to file multiple years of tax returns, raised significant concerns regarding his reliability and judgment.

Ultimately, the decision concluded that the applicant had not adequately mitigated the financial concerns, leading to the denial of his eligibility for access to classified information.

Why the Applicant Was Denied

The applicant had five delinquent consumer debts exceeding $15,000.
The applicant failed to file federal and state tax returns for tax years 2020-2023.
The applicant's financial issues raised concerns about his reliability and judgment.

Conditions Referenced

Disqualifying

19(a)appliedInability to Satisfy Debts
19(c)appliedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
19(f)appliedFailure to File or Fraudulently Filing Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax Returns, or Failure to Pay Annual Federal, State, or Local Income Tax as Required

Mitigating

20(b)rejectedThe Conditions That Resulted in the Financial Problem Were Largely Beyond the Person’s ControlThe applicant did not provide sufficient evidence of circumstances beyond his control.
20(d)rejectedThe Individual Initiated and Is Adhering to a Good-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors or Otherwise Resolve DebtsThe applicant's efforts were insufficient to mitigate the financial concerns.

Key Rule Quoted

“Eligibility for access to classified information may only be granted "upon a finding that it is clearly consistent with the national interest to do so."”
— Exec. Or. 10865, Safeguarding Classified Information within Industry § 2 (Feb. 20, 1960)

Procedural Posture

SOR issuedOct 9, 2024
Answer filedOct 15, 2024
Hearing heldFeb 19, 2025
Decision dateMar 28, 2025

Cite For

Denial of Security Clearance Due to Unresolved Financial Issues Under Guideline F
Insufficient Mitigation of Financial Concerns Despite Some Efforts
Failure to File Tax Returns as a Significant Factor in Security Clearance Decisions

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

Standardized Decision Profile

SEAD-4 Guideline F · descriptive summary of a decided case

Posture: HearingDecided: denied

The judge found significant financial concerns under Guideline F, including delinquent consumer debts and unfiled tax returns. While some debts were mitigated, the overall financial situation led to a denial of the applicant's security clearance.

¶	Allegation	Finding	Type	Response	Disqualifying (¶19)	Mitigating applied (¶20)	Mitigation
1.a	accumulated five delinquent consumer debts exceeding $15,000 $15,000	For Applicant	Unspecified Financial	Admitted	—	—	—
1.b	accrued federal taxes of $279 for tax year 2018 $279	For Applicant	Tax Unpaid	Admitted	—	—	—
1.c	failed to file his federal and state tax returns for tax years 2020-2023	Against Applicant	Tax Filing Failure	Admitted	—	—	Claimed Financial Event Outside Control

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case (Guideline F). The verbatim source decision is shown in full below.

Full decision

The complete, official text — footnotes and signatures included — is in the original PDF.