Summary
A 44-year-old hydraulics engineer was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct), stemming from a pattern of criminal behavior and issues with candor.
The applicant had three DUI-related incidents: one in December 1990, reduced to reckless driving; another in November 2000, also reduced to reckless driving; and a third in June 2003, which involved leaving the scene of an accident with personal injury. For the June 2003 incident, he was found guilty of four charges, later pleading guilty to one count of leaving the scene of an accident involving personal injury, a third-degree felony. His sentence included 15 weekends at a county farm, $284.00 in court costs and fees, $115,000.00 in victim restitution, and probation until February 2009.
Further issues arose from his failure to report the June 2003 incident to his facility security officer (FSO) and providing false information about its date when he eventually did report it. He also declined to provide a written financial statement to an OPM investigator. The judge found his explanations for not reporting the June 2003 incident to be unreasonable and not credible, ultimately leading to the denial of his security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant had a pattern of criminal behavior, including multiple DUI offenses and leaving the scene of an accident.
- The applicant's explanations for the delay in reporting the June 2003 incident were deemed unreasonable and not credible.
- The applicant's poor judgment in failing to report the incident to his facility security officer undermined his reliability and trustworthiness.
Conditions Referenced
- J DC 31.a.raisedCriminal Conduct
- E DC 16.a.raisedPersonal Conduct
- J MC 32.a.rejectedTime Elapsed Since Criminal BehaviorThe mere passage of time does not mitigate concerns due to ongoing probation.
- J MC 32.d.appliedEvidence of Successful RehabilitationLimited mitigation due to compliance with probation terms and absence of subsequent criminal activity.
Key Rule Quoted
“"Conduct that involves questionable judgment, lack of candor, dishonesty, or unwillingness to comply with rules and regulations, may also raise questions about an individual’s reliability, trustworthiness and ability to safeguard classified information."”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedApr 17, 2007
- Answer filedMay 21, 2007
- Hearing heldOct 11, 2007
- Decision dateDec 13, 2007
Cite For
- Pattern of Criminal Behavior Under Guideline J
- Credibility of Explanations for Not Reporting Incidents Under Guideline E
- Impact of Ongoing Probation on Security Clearance Eligibility.