Summary
A 51-year-old defense contractor was granted a security clearance despite allegations under Guideline G (Alcohol Consumption) and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The government raised concerns regarding the Applicant's long-standing alcohol abuse problem, which included three arrests for driving under the influence between 1992 and 2003. These incidents were cited as evidence of criminal conduct and a serious alcohol abuse problem.
However, the Applicant successfully mitigated these concerns. Following his last arrest in July 2003, he admitted to being an alcoholic and subsequently abstained from alcohol for nearly four years. He also attended alcohol treatment and established a supportive church-based network to maintain his sobriety.
The judge found that the Applicant demonstrated a credible intent to abstain from alcohol in the future. His long period of abstinence and positive community involvement effectively mitigated the government's concerns, leading to the granting of his security clearance.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The Applicant demonstrated a credible intent to abstain from alcohol in the future.
- He established a supportive church-based network that contributed to his sobriety.
- The Applicant's long period of abstinence and positive community involvement mitigated the Government's concerns.
Conditions Referenced
- J.1.araisedCriminal Conduct
- J.1.draisedMultiple Offenses
- G.2.araisedAlcohol-related Incidents
- G.2.craisedHabitual Consumption
- G.2.draisedDiagnosis of Alcohol Abuse
- G.2.graisedFailure to Follow Court Orders
- J.2.aappliedTime Elapsed Since Criminal Behavior
- J.2.dappliedEvidence of Successful Rehabilitation
- G.3.aappliedAcknowledgment of Alcohol Issues
- G.3.bappliedEvidence of Actions Taken to Overcome Alcohol Problem
Key Rule Quoted
“Each adjudication is to be an overall common sense determination based upon consideration and assessment of all available information, both favorable and unfavorable, with particular emphasis placed on the seriousness, recency, frequency, and motivation for the individual's conduct; the extent to which conduct was negligent, willful, voluntary, or undertaken with the knowledge of the circumstances or consequences involved; and, to the extent that it can be estimated, the probability that conduct will or will not continue in the future.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedDec 8, 2006
- Answer filedJan 8, 2007
- Hearing heldMar 13, 2007
- Decision dateApr 17, 2007
Cite For
- Mitigation of Alcohol-related Criminal Conduct Under Guideline J
- Successful Rehabilitation Efforts in Alcohol Abuse Cases
- Credibility of Intent to Abstain From Alcohol as a Mitigating Factor