Summary
A 33-year-old aerospace engineer with two master's degrees was granted a security clearance despite a history of serious juvenile criminal conduct, primarily under Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The government alleged several instances of criminal behavior. In 1991, at age fifteen, the applicant was found guilty of joyriding a neighbor's snowmobile, resulting in probation and restitution. The following year, he pled guilty to larceny charges for stealing magazines, receiving a sentence of detention, community service, and probation.
In 1993, while house-sitting, he drove a neighbor's car without permission, leading to a probation violation, which resulted in further detention, electronic tethering, extended probation, and additional community service. That same year, he was charged with larceny over $100.00 for taking cash from a hotel guest. At age sixteen, he committed armed robbery of a bank, pleading guilty to armed robbery and felony firearm charges, for which he was sentenced to 6 to 25 years and 2 years, respectively, with the sentences to be served consecutively.
Despite these disqualifying conditions, the judge applied mitigating factors, noting the applicant's significant rehabilitation and remorse. He had maintained a law-abiding life for over 17 years since his release from prison. His educational achievements and community contributions were considered compelling evidence of his changed character, leading to the ultimate decision to grant the security clearance.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant demonstrated significant rehabilitation and remorse for past criminal conduct.
- He has maintained a law-abiding life for over 17 years since his release from prison.
- The applicant's educational achievements and community contributions were compelling evidence of his changed character.
Conditions Referenced
- 31.(a)raisedA Single Serious Crime or Multiple Offenses
- 31.(c)raisedAllegation or Admission of Criminal Conduct
- 31.(f)raisedConviction in a Federal or State Court
- 32.(a)appliedSo Much Time Has Elapsed Since the Criminal Behavior Happened
- 32.(d)appliedEvidence of Successful Rehabilitation
Key Rule Quoted
“The adjudicative process is an examination of a sufficient period of a person’s life to make an affirmative determination that the person is an acceptable security risk.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJul 27, 2010
- Answer filedSep 15, 2010
- Hearing heldJan 18, 2011
- Decision dateApr 29, 2011
Cite For
- Successful Rehabilitation Under Guideline J
- The Impact of Time Elapsed Since Criminal Conduct on Security Clearance Eligibility
- The Importance of Community Contributions and Educational Achievements in Mitigating Past Criminal Behavior