Summary
A 59-year-old U.S. citizen, originally from the People's Republic of China (PRC), was granted a security clearance despite concerns under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) due to family ties in the PRC. The Statement of Reasons (SOR) alleged that the applicant's father, one sister, and mother-in-law are PRC citizens and residents. Additionally, the SOR noted that a niece, with whom the applicant previously communicated, is also a PRC citizen.
Specific allegations included that the applicant's 83-year-old retired father, a PRC citizen with no Communist Party affiliation, has had no contact with the applicant since 2009. The applicant's oldest sister, a local provincial clerk in the PRC with no Communist Party affiliation, occasionally participates in group texts with the applicant and another sister, but the applicant has not seen her in five years. The niece, a PRC citizen, had contact with the applicant from 2010 to 2014 while studying in the U.S., but communication ceased after December 2015, and she has no known ties to the Communist Party.
The security clearance was granted because the applicant demonstrated strong ties to the U.S., having resided there since 1983 and becoming a citizen in 2000. The applicant also showed limited contact with relatives in the PRC, mitigating the risk of foreign influence. Furthermore, the applicant has held a security clearance since 2006 without incident and is a respected engineer.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant has resided in the U.S. since 1983 and became a citizen in 2000, establishing strong ties to the country.
- The applicant has limited contact with relatives in the PRC, reducing the risk of foreign influence.
- The applicant has held a security clearance since 2006 without incident and is a respected engineer.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 7(a)raisedContact with Foreign Family Members
- AG ¶ 7(b)raisedConnections to Foreign Persons
- AG ¶ 8(a)appliedNature of Relationships with Foreign Persons
- AG ¶ 8(b)appliedMinimal Conflict of Interest
- AG ¶ 8(c)rejectedCasual and Infrequent Contact
Key Rule Quoted
“The mere possession of close family ties with a family member is not, as a matter of law, disqualifying under Guideline B.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedDec 13, 2015
- Answer filedJan 13, 2016
- Hearing heldAug 24, 2016
- Decision dateMar 6, 2017
Cite For
- Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B
- Importance of Established Ties to the U.S. in Security Clearance Cases
- Evaluation of Familial Relationships with Foreign Nationals in Security Clearance Determinations