Summary
A 36-year-old defense contractor was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct), stemming from a history of criminal behavior.
The applicant's record included a 1990 conviction for possession of stolen property, resulting in a fine, confinement, community service, and probation. In 1994, he was fined and received a suspended sentence for public nuisance. In 2001, he was convicted of obstruction of law enforcement after providing false information to police following a car accident involving his vehicle, leading to a fine and a largely suspended jail sentence. An Order for Protection was issued against him in 2003, which he subsequently violated, admitting to leaving a vulgar note and visiting his ex-girlfriend. A criminal trespass charge related to an incident prior to the order was deferred and later dismissed after he completed a fine and evaluations.
Most significantly, in 2006, the applicant was arrested for rape of a child, third degree, and later pled guilty to communicating with a child for immoral purposes. This resulted in a fine, a largely suspended confinement, two years probation, and an order to register as a sexual offender. The judge determined that the applicant's extensive criminal history, including the sexual offender conviction, and his violations of the Order for Protection, were not sufficiently mitigated by the evidence presented, leading to the denial of his security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The applicant has a lengthy history of criminal acts, including a conviction as a registered sexual offender.
- The applicant did not submit sufficient evidence to raise any mitigating condition for his criminal conduct.
- The applicant violated an Order for Protection on multiple occasions, raising concerns about his personal conduct.
Conditions Referenced
- J31raisedA Single Serious Crime or Multiple Lesser Offenses
- J30raisedAllegation or Admission of Criminal Conduct, Regardless of Whether the Person Was Formally Charged, Formally Prosecuted or Convicted
- E16appliedCredible Adverse Information in Several Adjudicative Issue Areas
- E16(d)appliedCredible Adverse Information That Is Not Explicitly Covered Under Any Other Guideline
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJun 23, 2008
- Answer filedJul 9, 2008Applicant elected to have the case decided on the written record.
- Hearing held—No hearing; decided on written record.
- Decision dateDec 31, 2008
Cite For
- Denial of Security Clearance Due to a History of Criminal Conduct
- Impact of Personal Conduct on Security Clearance Eligibility
- Failure to Mitigate Serious Criminal Offenses in Security Clearance Cases